The reading passage and the lecture are both about the massive stone buildings in North America called Great houses of Chaco Canyon. The passage states that the great houses served several purposes such as they used for residential purposes, they used for storage of food and they were ceremonial centers. The professor, on the other hand disagrees with each of the theories presented in the reading. He states that they didn't serve all these funtions and provides supports to claim his findings.
First, the reading passage states that the great houses were used for residential purposes, the architecture of those buildings have some similarities with the modern south west society's apartments. However, the professor disagrees. He argues that the inside of these stone buildings don't have any similarities with modern apartments because they lack enough fire places required for all the families in one building.
Next, the author says that, the great houses were used for storing the food, especially maize. On this point too, the professor disagrees. He contends that, if the houses served the purpose of storage, we could have seen the remnants of maize as well as maize containers.
Finally, the passage states that, the massive stone buildings were served ceremonial purpose. The author explains that the archeologists found broken pots from the houses and they assumed that people gathered there for ceremonies. The professor rejects this theory also. He defends that the archeologists found not only broken pots but they also found construction materials and stones from the houses. He says that the pots were used by construction workers tho eat their food and they were not used for ceremonial purposes.
The reading
passage
and the lecture are both about the massive
stone
buildings
in North America called
Great
houses
of
Chaco
Canyon. The
passage
states
that the
great
houses
served several
purposes
such as they
used
for residential
purposes
, they
used
for storage of
food and
they were ceremonial centers.
The
professor
,
on the other hand
disagrees with each of the theories presented in the reading. He
states
that they didn't serve all these
funtions
and provides supports to claim his findings.
First
, the reading
passage
states
that the
great
houses
were
used
for residential
purposes
, the architecture of those
buildings
have
some
similarities with the modern
south west
society's apartments.
However
, the
professor
disagrees. He argues that the inside of these
stone
buildings
don't have any similarities with modern apartments
because
they lack
enough
fire places required for all the families in one building.
Next
, the author says that, the
great
houses
were
used
for storing the food,
especially
maize. On this point too, the
professor
disagrees. He contends that, if the
houses
served the
purpose
of storage, we could have
seen
the remnants of maize
as well
as maize containers.
Finally
, the
passage
states
that, the massive
stone
buildings
were served
ceremonial
purpose
. The author
explains
that the archeologists found broken pots from the
houses and
they assumed that
people
gathered there for ceremonies. The
professor
rejects this theory
also
. He defends that the archeologists found not
only
broken pots
but
they
also
found construction materials and
stones
from the
houses
. He says that the pots were
used
by construction workers tho eat their
food and
they were not
used
for ceremonial
purposes
.