The reading passage and the lecture are both about new regulation for handeling and storing coal ash. While the passage states that there are several reasons to show that the new regulations are not seem necessary the lecture contradicts these claims and provides the evidence to the contrary.
First, the author argues that there are ristricted regulations for example the companies use much more liner when a new landfill is built. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that liner are not sufficient and liner just utilize for new landfill but there are several old field that could polluted envirenment.
Second, the according to the passage producers would discourage to recycle coal ash to new products because the cunsomer avoid to buy and use these products. However, the professor makes it clear by mentions mercury example. While the rules of mercury recycling are more restricted the companies are not give up recycling this substance.
Furtheremore, the passage holds the view that some new strict regulations are not economical convincing for companies and as a result the price of electricity bill will be increase. In contrary, the professor underlines the fact that of course electricity fee will be increase as a result of these rules but its advantageous weigh its disadvantageous. In this fashion, the fee increase for each bill would be about 1 percent.
The reading
passage
and the lecture are both about
new
regulation
for
handeling
and storing coal ash. While the
passage
states that there are several reasons to
show
that the
new
regulations
are not
seem
necessary the lecture contradicts these claims and provides the evidence to the contrary.
First
, the author argues that there are
ristricted
regulations
for example
the
companies
use
much more liner when a
new
landfill
is built
.
Conversely
, the lecturer brings up the
idea
that liner are
not sufficient and liner
just
utilize for
new
landfill
but
there are several
old
field
that could
polluted
envirenment
.
Second, the according to the
passage
producers would discourage to recycle coal ash to
new
products
because
the
cunsomer
avoid to
buy
and
use
these products.
However
, the professor
makes
it
clear
by mentions mercury example.
While
the
rules
of mercury recycling are more restricted the
companies
are not give up recycling this substance.
Furtheremore
, the
passage
holds the view that
some
new
strict
regulations
are not economical convincing for
companies
and
as a result
the price of electricity bill will be increase. In contrary, the professor underlines the fact that
of course
electricity fee will be increase
as a result
of these
rules
but
its advantageous weigh its disadvantageous. In this fashion, the fee increase for each bill would be about 1 percent.