The author of the argument claims that demolition the Rockingham’s old town hall and establishment of new building will be a prudent step to accommodate a large number of people and also help to generate some income. It might seem logical, at first glance, to concur with the argument but thorough assessment evinces some loopholes and assumptions on which the argument is based on.
First of all, the author claims that some citizens has proposed the idea of knocking down the century old town hall which is obviously has a profound cultural value. If some citizens agree, the number or the percentage value of the citizens are missing. Therefore, we can not refute the possibility of a decent number of citizens who do not want to tear down of such town hall imbued with historical value. Therefore this assumption is based on some statistical flaw.
Secondly, the author contends that the proposed new building will be energy efficient as it will be equipped with energy efficient cooler and heater. Moreover, he states that the new building will be able to accommodate more people. If more people starts dwelling that place, it would augment the expense of electricity instead of decreasing as he mentioned. Hence this claim is also based on some incoherent conjecture.
Finally, The passage is based on some ground which fails to substantiate the feasibility of such recommendations and its consequences. Therefore, this argument is flawed and unwarranted.
The author of the
argument
claims that demolition the Rockingham’s
old
town hall and establishment of new building will be a prudent step to accommodate
a large number of
people
and
also
help
to generate
some
income. It might seem logical, at
first
glance, to concur with the
argument
but
thorough assessment evinces
some
loopholes and assumptions on which the
argument
is based
on.
First of all
, the author claims that
some
citizens
has proposed the
idea
of knocking down the century
old
town hall which is
obviously
has a profound cultural value. If
some
citizens
agree
, the number or the percentage value of the
citizens
are missing.
Therefore
, we can not refute the possibility of a decent number of
citizens
who do not want to tear down of such town hall imbued with historical value.
Therefore
this assumption
is based
on
some
statistical flaw.
Secondly
, the author contends that the proposed new building will be energy efficient as it will
be equipped
with energy efficient cooler and heater.
Moreover
, he states that the new building will be able to accommodate more
people
. If more
people
starts
dwelling that place, it would augment the expense of electricity
instead
of decreasing as he mentioned.
Hence
this claim is
also
based on
some
incoherent conjecture.
Finally
, The passage
is based
on
some
ground which fails to substantiate the feasibility of such recommendations and its consequences.
Therefore
, this
argument
is flawed
and unwarranted.