Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

One theory is that the manuscript is a genuine work on some scientific or magical subject composed in a complex secret code. Anthony Ascham, a sixteenth-century physician and botanist, has been identified as a possible author, since many plant illustratio

One theory is that the manuscript is a genuine work on some scientific or magical subject composed in a complex secret code. Anthony Ascham, a sixteenth-century physician and botanist, has been identified as a possible author, since many plant illustratio VB05Q
The reading and the lecture are both about Voynich manuscript, which is handwritten book written on vellum. The author of the reading states several theories to explain the origin of the Voynich manuscript. The speaker does not believe any of these theories and he argues that it was written by none of the people mentioned in the article. Firstly, the article points out the first theory that the manuscript was written by Anthony Ascham because of the complex secret codes presented in the book. It is stated in the reading that as Ascham was physician and a botanist who could probably be familiar with the medicinal plants described in the manuscript. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She says that Ascham was a ordinary physician and it is unlikely be written by him. Furthermore, she suggest that book contains information about all common herbal drugs where it can be easily obtained information from other popular references. Secondly, according to second theory it was a fake and was Edward Kelley with the intention to make money by selling books to nobles across Europe. The lecturer rebuts this theory as well. He suggests that the creator of the book took a lot of effort to write this book and it is not the Kellyr who wrote the book. He elaborates on this by mentioning that it was unnecessary for Kelley to put such a lot of effort if he his intention was to cheat noble people because those people were very vulnerable. Thirdly, the author points out that the manuscript was fake written M. Vonich himself. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that the dating technology clearly shows that both the paper and the ink are 400 years old and it is not possible for him to get such an old paper, so it is unlikely to be written by him. He also says that the book was written by someone else lived centuries ahead.
The reading and the lecture are both about
Voynich
manuscript
, which is handwritten
book
written
on vellum. The author of the reading states several
theories
to
explain
the origin of the
Voynich
manuscript
.
The
speaker does not believe any of these
theories and
he argues that it was
written
by none of the
people
mentioned in the article.

Firstly
, the article points out the
first
theory
that the
manuscript
was
written
by Anthony
Ascham
because
of the complex secret codes presented in the
book
. It
is stated
in the reading that as
Ascham
was physician and a botanist who could
probably
be familiar with the medicinal plants
described
in the
manuscript
. This point
is challenged
by the lecturer. She says that
Ascham
was
a
ordinary physician and it is unlikely be
written
by him.
Furthermore
, she
suggest
that
book
contains information about all common herbal drugs where it can be
easily
obtained information from other popular references.

Secondly
, according to second
theory
it was a fake and was Edward Kelley with the intention to
make
money by selling
books
to nobles across Europe. The lecturer rebuts this
theory
as well
. He suggests that the creator of the
book
took
a lot of
effort to write this
book
and it is not the
Kellyr
who wrote the
book
. He elaborates on this by mentioning that it was unnecessary for Kelley to put such
a lot of
effort if he
his
intention was to cheat noble
people
because
those
people
were
very
vulnerable.

Thirdly
, the author points out that the
manuscript
was fake
written
M.
Vonich
himself. The lecturer,
on the other hand
, posits that the dating technology
clearly
shows
that both the paper and the ink are 400 years
old
and it is not possible for him to
get
such an
old
paper,
so
it is unlikely to be
written
by him. He
also
says that the
book
was
written
by someone else
lived
centuries ahead.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay One theory is that the manuscript is a genuine work on some scientific or magical subject composed in a complex secret code. Anthony Ascham, a sixteenth-century physician and botanist, has been identified as a possible author, since many plant illustratio

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
325 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: