The reading passage is about the advantages of fuel-cell engines over the internal-combustion engines. The lecturer, however disagrees the points made in the reading passage. Although she agrees that internal-combustion engine produces more pollution, and harmful to environment, she thinks that fuel -cell engine do also have some disadvantages.
Firstly, the author of reading suggest that fuel-cell engines utilize easily available, renewable resource of hydrogen whereas, combustion based engines needs petroleum which is easily depleting. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She mentions that even though hydrogen is freely available in environment, the form of hydrogen needed in fuel-cell engine is not freely available. It needs a pure liquid state of hydrogen, which is an artificial form. She also states that it is very difficult to produce and store this form of hydrogen as it needs elaborate cooling of about -253 degree Celsius.
Secondly, the authors points out that the by product of fuel -cell engine is water which is not harmful to the environment. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She states that even though the by product is harmless, the way of manufacturing pure hydrogen involves burning of coal and fuel in factories, thus exhausting a lot of harmful fumes to environment.
Thirdly, the author posits that fuel-cell engines are more economical than combustion based vehicle. The lecturer, on the other hand, says that this is not true because there is a platinum component in fuel-cell engine which is very expensive. This metal is very crucial for the chemical reaction to take place in the machine. . There is no replacement of platinum yet found, so it is going to be expensive.
The reading passage is about the advantages of fuel-cell
engines
over the internal-combustion
engines
. The
lecturer
,
however
disagrees the points made in the reading passage. Although she
agrees
that internal-combustion
engine
produces more pollution, and harmful to environment, she
thinks
that fuel -cell
engine
do
also
have
some
disadvantages.
Firstly
, the author of reading suggest that fuel-cell
engines
utilize
easily
available, renewable resource of hydrogen whereas, combustion based
engines
needs petroleum which is
easily
depleting. The
lecturer
rebuts this argument. She mentions that
even though
hydrogen is
freely
available in environment, the form of hydrogen needed in fuel-cell
engine
is not
freely
available. It needs a pure liquid state of hydrogen, which is an artificial form. She
also
states that it is
very
difficult to produce and store this form of hydrogen as it needs elaborate cooling of about -253 degree Celsius.
Secondly
, the authors points out that the by product of fuel -cell
engine
is water which is not harmful to the environment. This point
is challenged
by the
lecturer
. She states that
even though
the by product is harmless, the way of manufacturing pure hydrogen involves burning of coal and fuel in factories,
thus
exhausting
a lot of
harmful fumes to environment.
Thirdly
, the author posits that fuel-cell
engines
are more economical than combustion based vehicle. The
lecturer
,
on the other hand
, says that this is not true
because
there is a platinum component in fuel-cell
engine
which is
very
expensive. This metal is
very
crucial for the chemical reaction to take place in the machine.
.
There is no replacement of platinum
yet
found,
so
it is going to be expensive.