The reading claims that scientists have advanced several hypotheses to explain the decline of populations of the yellow cedar trees, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, and provides three hypthesis of support. However, the professor states that the explanations in the reading are unconvincing and he refutes each of the author's hypotheses.
Frist, the article avers that one hypothesis is that yellow cedar decline may be caused by insect parasites, specifically the cedar bark beetle. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this point by stating that the problem in this hypothesis is that the healthy trees is more resistance to the insects. In fact, he says that barks and leaves of the tree produce chemical materials that protect the trees from the insects, so beetle attacks the trees which already died and not the live one. This explains that insects are not responsible for declining.
Second, the passage asserts that the second hypothesis attributes the decline to brown bears because they claw at the cedar in order to eat the tree bark. On the other hand, the professor counters this point by saying that although some trees are be affected by bears, but it is not the cause of declining the population. Actually, he mentions that there is trees population cross the island coast of North America and there are no bears in this Island, so the decreasing in the trees population is with or without the bears. He argues that brown bears are not responsible for decreasing.
Third, the article posits that the third hypothesis states that gradual changes of climate may be to blame. Conversely, the professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that the reading forgot to the fact that tree dies in low elevation and in high elevation, so the tree should be die only in high elevation because the low temperatures instead of low elevation. In fact, the tree dies in low elevation also so the the low temperatures don't kill the tree.
The reading claims that scientists have advanced several hypotheses to
explain
the decline of
populations
of the yellow
cedar
trees
, a species of
tree
that is
common in northwestern North America, and provides three
hypthesis
of support.
However
, the professor states that the explanations in the reading are
unconvincing and
he refutes each of the author's hypotheses.
Frist
, the article avers that one
hypothesis
is that yellow
cedar
decline may
be caused
by
insect
parasites,
specifically
the
cedar
bark beetle.
In contrast
, the lecturer opposes this point by stating that the problem in this
hypothesis
is that the healthy
trees
is more resistance to the
insects
. In fact, he says that barks and
leaves
of the
tree
produce chemical materials that protect the
trees
from the
insects
,
so
beetle attacks the
trees
which already
died
and not the
live
one. This
explains
that
insects
are not responsible for declining.
Second, the passage asserts that the second
hypothesis
attributes the decline to brown
bears
because
they claw at the
cedar
in order to eat the
tree
bark.
On the other hand
, the professor counters this point by saying that although
some
trees
are
be
affected
by
bears
,
but
it is not the cause of declining the
population
. Actually, he mentions that there is
trees
population
cross the island coast of North America and there are no
bears
in this Island
,
so
the decreasing in the
trees
population
is with or without the
bears
. He argues that brown
bears
are not responsible for decreasing.
Third, the article posits that the third
hypothesis
states that gradual
changes
of climate may be to blame.
Conversely
, the professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that the reading forgot to the fact that
tree
dies
in
low
elevation
and in high
elevation
,
so
the
tree
should be
die
only
in high
elevation
because
the
low
temperatures
instead
of
low
elevation
. In fact, the
tree
dies
in
low
elevation
also
so
the the
low
temperatures don't kill the
tree
.