Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

nuclear energy

nuclear energy kYEgR
The reading claims that nuclear energy must be seen as the solution, as the next logical step in the evolution of energy production and provides three reasons of support. In contrast, the professor states that this idea is premature and he refutes each of the author's reason. First, the article avers that the fuel that power nuclear plants is cheap compared to the fossil fuels we currently use to supply most of our energy needs. On the other hand, the professor opposes this point by saying that it is not cheap. In fact, he mentions that build these fuels takes time and expertise and they should spend more money to build these fuels. In addition, the governments require to put an emergency plan to protect the public in case of emergency and this is significant expensive. Second, The reading asserts that the process to creating nuclear energy is relatively safe. Conversely, the lecturer counters this point by saying that accidents still happen. He says the even though current plan could prevent catastrophe, but the results still devastating to the public. The professor gives an example to illustrate this point. He states that in WPR in Pennsylvania, radiation was released a few amount of radio active, but it yeild no threaten to the public. Actually, it cost one billion dollars to fix it, Furthermore, the psychological condition placed to the public was severe. Third, the passage posits that the hazardous radioactive was generated by nuclear energy power plants can be managed. However, the professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that these wastes are not easy to manage. According to the professor, throught processing, Putanuim is produced and this is danger of theft for weaponry purpose. Moreover, through reprocessing, the waste must be stored deep ground and this is a very difficult task. He says that if appropriate place will find, the citizens often stop this action.
The reading claims that nuclear
energy
must
be
seen
as the solution, as the
next
logical step in the evolution of
energy
production and provides three reasons of support.
In contrast
, the
professor
states that this
idea
is
premature and
he refutes each of the author's reason.

First
, the article avers that the
fuel
that power nuclear plants is
cheap
compared to the fossil
fuels
we
currently
use to
supply most of our
energy
needs.
On the other hand
, the
professor
opposes this
point
by saying that it is not
cheap
. In fact, he mentions that build these
fuels
takes time and
expertise and
they should spend more money to build these
fuels
.
In addition
, the
governments
require to put an emergency plan to protect the
public
in case of emergency and this is significant expensive.

Second, The reading asserts that the process to creating nuclear
energy
is
relatively
safe.
Conversely
, the lecturer counters this
point
by saying that accidents
still
happen. He says the
even though
current
plan could
prevent
catastrophe,
but
the results
still
devastating to the
public
. The
professor
gives an example to illustrate this
point
. He states that in
WPR
in Pennsylvania, radiation
was released
a
few amount
of radio active,
but
it
yeild
no threaten to the
public
. Actually, it cost one billion dollars to
fix
it,
Furthermore
, the psychological condition placed to the
public
was severe.

Third, the passage posits that the hazardous radioactive
was generated
by nuclear
energy
power plants can
be managed
.
However
, the
professor
casts doubt on this
point
by explaining that these wastes are not easy to manage. According to the
professor
,
throught
processing,
Putanuim
is produced
and this is
danger
of theft for weaponry purpose.
Moreover
, through reprocessing, the waste
must
be stored
deep ground and this is a
very
difficult task. He says that if appropriate place will find, the citizens
often
stop
this action.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay nuclear energy

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
317 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: