Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The reading and the passage are both contradicting with each other, in terms of use and purpose regarding the carved stone balls.

The reading and the passage are both contradicting with each other, in terms of use and purpose regarding the carved stone balls. r8kwL
The reading and the passage are both contradicting with each other, in terms of use and purpose regarding the carved stone balls. The author of the reading presented three theories in support for that the carved stone balls were used purposefully. However, the lecturer casts doubt about the claim presented in the article and refutes all the idea presented in the paragraph. He added that all the idea are not practical and convincing. First of all, according to the article, the holes and grooves on the carved stone ball showed that they might have used for hunting or fighting. On the contrary, the speaker negates the arguments presented in the passage. Furthermore, he discusses that if the stone ball has been used as a weapon, there would have some wear on the ball, however, nothing like that was found on that. Also, none of the balls was broken off which proved that stone balls must not have used as a weapon or fighting purpose. Secondly, the author posits that stone balls were too heavy in weight, and thereby, they might have used as a primitive system of weight and measures. Although the lecturer refutes this by asserting that the density of these balls varies from each other because they are made of different materials. Even, the same size of two balls shows different weight. Therefore, the weight measure theory was wrong for the stone balls. Finally, it is mentioned in the article that the elaborated special design on the stone ball may mark the social status of their owners, and because of that, they might have used for a social purpose. On the other hand, the speaker believes that if they were serving a purpose in a social community then they would have been buried in the grave as it was their personal possession, but no balls were found in the grave. Hence, this theory is not acceptable too.
The reading and the passage are both contradicting with each other, in terms of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
and purpose regarding the carved
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stone
balls. The author of the reading
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
presented
three theories in support for that the carved
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stone
balls were
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
purposefully
.
However
, the lecturer casts doubt about the claim
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
presented
in the article and refutes all the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
presented
in the paragraph. He
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
added
that all the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
are not practical and convincing.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
, according to the article, the holes and grooves on the carved
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stone
ball
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
that they might have
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for hunting or fighting.
On the contrary
, the speaker negates the arguments
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
presented
in the passage.
Furthermore
, he discusses that if the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stone
ball has been
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
as a weapon, there would have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
wear on the ball,
however
, nothing like that
was found
on that.
Also
, none of the balls
was broken
off which proved that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stone
balls
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
not have
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
as a weapon or fighting purpose.

Secondly
, the author posits that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stone
balls were too heavy in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
weight
, and thereby, they might have
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
as a primitive system of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
weight
and measures. Although the lecturer refutes this by asserting that the density of these balls varies from each other
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
they
are made
of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
materials. Even, the same size of two balls
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
weight
.
Therefore
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
weight
measure theory was
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stone
balls.

Finally
, it
is mentioned
in the article that the elaborated special design on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stone
ball may mark the social status of their owners, and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of that, they might have
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for a social purpose.
On the other hand
, the speaker believes that if they were serving a purpose in a social community then they would have
been buried
in the grave as it was their personal possession,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
no balls
were found
in the grave.
Hence
, this theory is not acceptable too.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The reading and the passage are both contradicting with each other, in terms of use and purpose regarding the carved stone balls.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
319 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The reading and the passage are both contradicting with each other, in terms of use and purpose regarding the carved stone balls.