Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The reading and the lecture are both contradicting with each other, in terms of underwater sound namely quackers.

The reading and the lecture are both contradicting with each other, in terms of underwater sound namely quackers. MMwpo
The reading and the lecture are both contradicting with each other, in terms of underwater sound namely quackers. The author of the article presented three theories about the cause that leads to producing odd sounds. However, the lecturer casts doubt about the claim presented in the passage and negates all the arguments explained in the article. First of all, according to the article, the sound might be the orca sound, which could be generated by male and female whales to attract a mate underwater. On the contrary, the speaker undermines the arguments presented in the article. Furthermore, she discusses that whales usually live near the surface water of the ocean, and on the other hand, submarine stays in the deep in the ocean. Additionally, there were no whales detected nearby the submarine. Thus, the idea of the orca sound is not convincing. Secondly, the author posits that the sound might have been produced by the giant squid since their complex brain has the ability to produce such sound. Although the lecturer refutes this by asserting that the sound of giant squid have been detected by the submarine for two decades between 1960 to 1980, and afterward, the submarine has not detected this type sound till now, however, the giant squid is still living in the same area where submarine are present. So, it is impossible that the sound was detected only two decades, and then suddenly it disappeared. Hence, this theory is not acceptable. Finally, it is mentioned in the paragraph that some secret submarine from the other country were present in that area, and the sound might have been generated by this submarine. On the other hand, the speaker again opposes this solution and describes that if there was any other submarine present, it must have created sound by the engine of that submarine or the submarine might have been detected by the detectors. Additionally, it is impossible to make such engines by the technology which can drive the submarine without making sound, and scientist have not developed submarine which can run so fast that it cannot be able to detect through sonar detectors.
The reading and the lecture are both contradicting with each
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
, in terms of underwater
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sound
namely
Possible spelling mistake found.
quackers
. The author of the article presented three theories about the cause that leads to producing odd
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sounds
.
However
, the lecturer casts doubt about the claim presented in the passage and negates all the arguments
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explained
in the article.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
, according to the article, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sound
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
might
be the orca
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sound
, which could
be generated
by male and female whales to attract a mate underwater.
On the contrary
, the speaker undermines the arguments presented in the article.
Furthermore
, she discusses that whales
usually
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
near the surface water of the ocean, and on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
submarine
stays in the deep in the ocean.
Additionally
, there were no whales
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
detected
nearby the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
submarine
.
Thus
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
of the orca
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sound
is not convincing.

Secondly
, the author posits that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sound
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
might
have
been produced
by the giant squid since their complex brain has the ability to produce such
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sound
. Although the lecturer refutes this by asserting that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sound
of giant squid have been
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
detected
by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
submarine
for two decades
Use "between" + "and" not "to." Try this: "between 1960 and 1980".
between 1960 to 1980
, and afterward, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
submarine
has not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
detected
this type
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sound
till
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
,
however
, the giant squid is
still
living in the same area where
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
submarine
are present.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, it is impossible that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sound
was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
detected
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
two decades, and then
suddenly
it disappeared.
Hence
, this theory is not acceptable.

Finally
, it
is mentioned
in the paragraph that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
secret
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
submarine
from the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
country were present in that area, and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sound
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
might
have
been generated
by this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
submarine
. On the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand, the speaker again opposes this solution and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
describes
that if there was any
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
submarine
present, it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
have created
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sound
by the engine of that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
submarine
or the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
submarine
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
might
have been
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
detected
by the detectors.
Additionally
, it is impossible to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
such engines by the technology which can drive the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
submarine
without making
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sound
, and scientist have not developed
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
submarine
which can run
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
fast
that it cannot be able to detect through sonar detectors.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The reading and the lecture are both contradicting with each other, in terms of underwater sound namely quackers.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
355 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The reading and the lecture are both contradicting with each other, in terms of underwater sound namely quackers.