Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The reading and the listening are contradicting with each other, in terms of invasion of the zebra mussel.

The reading and the listening are contradicting with each other, in terms of invasion of the zebra mussel. doDOo
The reading and the listening are contradicting with each other, in terms of invasion of the zebra mussel. The author of the reading states that this invasion cannot be prevented and also it would create a serious threat to freshwater fish populations in North America. However, the lecturer casts doubt about the claim and negates all the theories presented in the passage. First of all, according to the article, the invasion of the mussel is possible due to human transportation where the mussels can attach with the bottom of the ship and spread all over North America. On the other hand, the speaker negates the argument and mentions about the mussels that it could not be stoppable in past but nowadays, with the help knowledge, it is possible to stop the mussels spreading all over the North American ocean. Furthermore, the describes that the ship which carried the ballast water with its bottom, it can be dumped into the ocean just beside the ocean, and this way, the mussels cannot survive in the saltwater. Secondly, the author states that zebra mussels have been dominating in the new habitats since there are no predators who can eat them. Thus, it will create a big threat to ocean fish who lives there. Although the lecturer undermines this by asserting that there are many birds who are in search of the food in that place. As a result, whenever the bird would find the new creature living in that habitat, they will start eating them. As a result, the mussels cannot be overcrowded in that place. Hence, this idea is not acceptable. Finally, it is mentioned in the paragraph that since the mussels are plankton eater, the fish would need to compete for the plankton plant with the mussels and thereby, the population of fish might be declined over the time. On the contrary, here also, the lecturer refutes the idea and describes it is true that some fish population might be decreased, although the mussels have a positive effect on the fish population who lives at the bottom of the ocean because they get food in form of nutrient from the zebra mussels. Therefore, the final idea is also true and acceptable.
The reading and the listening are contradicting with each other, in terms of invasion of the zebra
mussel
. The author of the reading states that this invasion cannot be
prevented
and
also
it would create a serious threat to freshwater fish
populations
in North America.
However
, the lecturer casts doubt about the claim and negates all the theories presented in the passage.

First of all
, according to the article, the invasion of the
mussel
is possible due to human transportation where the
mussels
can attach with the bottom of the ship and spread all over North America.
On the other hand
, the speaker negates the argument and
mentions about the
mussels
that it could not be stoppable in past
but
nowadays, with the
help
knowledge, it is possible to
stop
the
mussels
spreading all over the North American
ocean
.
Furthermore
, the
describes
that the ship which carried the ballast water with its bottom, it can
be dumped
into the
ocean
just
beside the
ocean
, and this way, the
mussels
cannot survive in the saltwater.

Secondly
, the author states that zebra
mussels
have been dominating in the new habitats since there are no predators
who
can eat them.
Thus
, it will create a
big
threat to
ocean
fish
who
lives
there.
Although
the lecturer undermines this by asserting that there are
many
birds
who
are in search of the food in that place.
As a result
, whenever the bird would find the new creature living in that habitat, they will
start
eating them.
As a result
, the
mussels
cannot
be overcrowded
in that place.
Hence
, this
idea
is not acceptable.

Finally
, it
is mentioned
in the paragraph that since the
mussels
are plankton eater, the fish would need to compete for the plankton plant with the
mussels
and thereby, the
population
of fish might
be declined
over the time.
On the contrary
, here
also
, the lecturer refutes the
idea
and
describes
it is true that
some
fish
population
might
be decreased
, although the
mussels
have a
positive
effect on the fish
population
who
lives
at the bottom of the
ocean
because
they
get
food in form of nutrient from the zebra
mussels
.
Therefore
, the final
idea
is
also
true and acceptable.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The reading and the listening are contradicting with each other, in terms of invasion of the zebra mussel.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
370 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: