Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The more money a person has, the more he or she should give away to charities

The more money a person has, the more he or she should give away to charities e51kG
Nowadays, people highly try to meet their needs, so they always make a lot of attempts to earn money. A controversial question in this regard is that should a person who has more money more give away to charities? In my opinion, I think that people who have more money should use the money for the other purposes to get more advantages. I elaborate my reasons hereunder. The first reason comes to my mind is that people with more money should invest in some projects to improve the quality of people’s lives, so not only do all people take enormous benefits, but also poor people can use the advantages of these improvements. Investing money in the various realms such as agriculture, and industrial causes many developments in their countries, and therefore this investing provides high-quality welfare for people living in the poverty. On the other hand, donating to charities only can meet primitive needs such as food, clothing, but by investing, poor people can get benefits all aspects of developed countries such as various job positions, high-tech technology, and so forth. The second reason is that living in the contemporary world requires the wide range of necessaries to live with more wellbeing. Generally, many things which people need are greatly expensive such as a place for accommodation and a sufficient car, so people try to have more money and accumulate a hoard of money to purchase their needs. However, if they donate their little money, eventually, they will engage in poverty. Also, the value of their donations is very low price and cannot help the charities to solve the considerable problems of poverty. The economic standpoint shows that ordinary people who always suffer many economic problems should accumulate their cash for themselves. All in all, in my opinion, donating more by people have more money is not practical because not only people cannot afford their normal life should save money, but also people have more money should invest in various economic plans to flourish their countries.
Nowadays,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
highly
try to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
meet
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
needs
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
they always
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
attempts to earn
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
. A controversial question in this regard is that should a person who has more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
more give away to charities? In my opinion, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who have more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
for the other purposes to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
more advantages. I elaborate my reasons hereunder.

The
first
reason
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
comes
to my mind is that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
with more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
should invest in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
projects to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improve
the quality of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people’s
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
do all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
take enormous benefits,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
the advantages of these improvements. Investing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
in the various realms such as agriculture, and industrial causes
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
developments in their countries, and
therefore
this investing provides high-quality welfare for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
living in the poverty.
On the other hand
, donating to charities
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
meet
primitive
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
needs
such as food, clothing,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
by investing, poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
benefits all aspects of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
developed countries
such as various job positions, high-tech technology, and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
forth.

The second reason is that living in the contemporary world requires the wide range of necessaries to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
with more
Possible spelling mistake found.
wellbeing
.
Generally
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
things which
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
need
are
greatly
expensive such as a place for accommodation and a sufficient car,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
try to have more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
and accumulate a hoard of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
purchase
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
needs
.
However
, if they donate their
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
,
eventually
, they will engage in poverty.
Also
, the value of their donations is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
low price and cannot
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
the charities to solve the considerable problems of poverty. The economic standpoint
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
that ordinary
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who always suffer
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
economic problems should accumulate their cash for themselves.

All in all, in my opinion, donating more by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
have more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
is not practical
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
cannot afford their normal life should save
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
have more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
should invest in various economic plans to flourish their countries.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The more money a person has, the more he or she should give away to charities

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
336 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The more money a person has, the more he or she should give away to charities