Science has been an important role to keep society up to date and ready to face each problem. Inventions improve people's life. Some people believe the government should support scientific research even if there’s no suitable for use, but others think otherwise. I believe the government should not support non-practical inventions because of two main reasons which I will explore below.
First, in this day and age of information explosion, finding and supporting the best research to grow our society is an important factor for authorities. Budget resources for each field in society are specific and limited, so senior officials should use them in the best path, like providing practical goods and services to prepare the best opportunity for the growth and development of the society. For example, in our university, every year students work on several thesis, and annually university spends a lot of money for supporting those projects, which no one has a good effect on our society, by that means, we waste a lot of budget and time for something that does not help for improving people's lives and the advance of society, therefore all of the problems are steady in our homeland.
Second, one of the duties of the government is to prepare the way and encourage scientists to find practical solutions to solve society's problems. If the state spends money on all inventions and makes no difference between practical and non-practical studies, the motivation of people on useful inventions will decrease, and as a result, society will be unable to face problems and cause backwardness and problems increase.
To conclude, based on the points mentioned above, governments should not support scientific non-practical researches. Not only will waste the budget source and time of society but also It does not create the position for producing better ideas.
Science has been an
important
role to
keep
society
up to date and ready to face each
problem
. Inventions
improve
people
's life.
Some
people
believe the
government
should support scientific research even if there’s no suitable for
use
,
but
others
think
otherwise
. I believe the
government
should not support non-practical inventions
because
of two main reasons which I will explore below.
First
, in this day and age of information explosion, finding and supporting the best research to grow our
society
is an
important
factor for authorities. Budget resources for each field in
society
are specific and limited,
so
senior officials should
use
them in the best path, like providing practical
goods
and services to prepare the best opportunity for the growth and development of the
society
.
For example
, in our university, every year students work on
several thesis
, and
annually
university spends
a lot of
money for supporting those projects, which no one has a
good
effect on our
society
, by that means, we waste
a lot of
budget and time for something that does not
help
for improving
people
's
lives
and the advance of
society
,
therefore
all of the
problems
are steady in our homeland.
Second, one of the duties of the
government
is to prepare the way and encourage scientists to find practical solutions to solve society's
problems
. If the state spends money on all inventions and
makes
no difference between practical and non-practical studies, the motivation of
people
on useful inventions will decrease, and
as a result
,
society
will be unable to face
problems
and cause backwardness and
problems
increase.
To conclude
, based on the points mentioned above,
governments
should not support scientific non-practical researches. Not
only
will waste the budget source and time of
society
but
also
It does not create the position for producing better
ideas
.