Often the discussion goes controversial on matter of allocating more money on arts than education of the people in a country. Although both area are essential aspects in the development process of an administration, still investing on education needs an upper hand to decentralize the benefits to majority as compared to arts. So in the following paragraphs below throw light on why I completely agree to stand with education.
No doubt at all, heavy budgeting on schooling by the government will reap the result of economic development as well as raising the standard of life among the people in a country. It is irrefutable because the benefits of allocation vest on the majority of the commoners whereas arts are chosen by few interested people and the advantages are shared by few in a country. The development of education really fills the gap of job opportunities, even skilled education makes the economic pillar of the country stronger. For instance, the economic development of Middle East countries are the result of recruiting skilled professionals from the nook and corner of the world. Therefore no rule wouldn't lament over the expenses spent on education.
Secondly, the unemployment is the devastating phenomenon that a government push back to underdevelopment due to the inadequate budgeting on education. It is the professionalism and efficiency of the employer really matters to recruit the people to job sector and undeveloped education system increase the insecurity of employment for its beneficiaries. Hiring the educated from the good academic institution by the multinational companies are the real epitome of establishing quality education system in a regime. Therefor to combat unemployment, every penny is to be spend worth fully to enhance qualitative literacy by the government.
In conclusion, I would say that due priorities to general education should not be denied. Government should have adequate plan to equilibrate every sector without losing its essence because development includes everything.
Often
the discussion goes controversial on matter of allocating more money on arts than
education
of the
people
in a
country
. Although both area are essential aspects in the
development
process of an administration,
still
investing on
education
needs an upper hand to decentralize the benefits to majority as compared to arts.
So
in the following paragraphs below throw light on why I completely
agree
to stand with education.
No doubt at all, heavy budgeting on schooling by the
government
will reap the result of economic
development
as well
as raising the standard of life among the
people
in a
country
. It is irrefutable
because
the benefits of allocation vest on the majority of the commoners whereas arts
are chosen
by few interested
people
and the advantages
are shared
by few in a
country
. The
development
of
education
really
fills the gap of
job opportunities, even skilled
education
makes
the economic pillar of the
country
stronger.
For instance
, the economic
development
of Middle East
countries
are the result of recruiting skilled professionals from the nook and corner of the world.
Therefore
no
rule
wouldn't lament over the expenses spent on education.
Secondly
, the unemployment is the devastating phenomenon that a
government
push back to underdevelopment due to the inadequate budgeting on
education
. It is the professionalism and efficiency of the employer
really
matters to recruit the
people
to job sector and undeveloped
education
system increase the insecurity of employment for its beneficiaries. Hiring the educated from the
good
academic institution by the multinational
companies
are the real epitome of establishing quality
education
system in a regime. Therefor to combat unemployment, every penny is to be
spend
worth
fully
to enhance qualitative literacy by the
government
.
In conclusion
, I would say that due priorities to general
education
should not
be denied
.
Government
should have adequate plan to equilibrate every sector without losing its essence
because
development
includes everything.