The number of vehicles have increased over the years, and it has being speculated that 29 million vehicles will be moving on British roads and highways by 2030. I strongly support the utilization of other transport methods, and the institution of legislation on car use and ownership due to the various dangers it could pose.
Opponents of car use limitation may say that road transport is convenient and cost effective. They may claim that it saves them the hustle and bustle of moving to different destinations as regards high cost of other travel means but they fail to see the environmental hazards excessive car use can cause. This is because the exhaust fumes from these automobiles contain toxic gases such as carbon monoxide and nitrous oxide. Thus, when these gases are getting increasingly released into the atmosphere, they can cause global warming.
Furthermore, the use of other transport means can have beneficial health effects and environmental benefits. This is as a result of increased physical exercise which minimizes a sedentary lifestyle and has limited air pollution. For instance, in Norway, it was reported that the culture of biking amongst the populace has greatly impacted the air quality. Hence, other transport means are encouraged. In addition, enacting laws and regulations to control the impact of the ever-rising car use will instill the habit of a prudent car use. Consequently, it reduces atmospheric pollutants released by cars.
In conclusion, Even though some may oppose the limitation of car use, I strongly agree with the notion due to the serious environmental damage it can cause. Therefore, it is important to implore other methods of conveying people and goods, taking note of the positive effects such as, a healthy lifestyle and limited greenhouse effect, and also to implement laws against car use.
The number of vehicles
have
increased over the years, and it has
being speculated
that 29 million vehicles will be moving on British roads and highways by 2030. I
strongly
support the utilization of
other
transport
methods, and the institution of legislation on
car
use
and ownership due to the various
dangers
it could pose.
Opponents of
car
use
limitation may say that road
transport
is convenient and cost effective. They may claim that it saves them the hustle and bustle of moving to
different
destinations as regards high cost of
other
travel means
but
they fail to
see
the environmental hazards excessive
car
use
can cause. This is
because
the exhaust fumes from these automobiles contain toxic gases such as carbon monoxide and nitrous oxide.
Thus
, when these gases are getting
increasingly
released into the atmosphere, they can cause global warming.
Furthermore
, the
use
of
other
transport
means can have beneficial health effects and environmental benefits. This is
as a result
of increased physical exercise which minimizes a sedentary lifestyle and has limited air pollution.
For instance
, in Norway, it
was reported
that the culture of biking amongst the populace has
greatly
impacted the air quality.
Hence
,
other
transport
means
are encouraged
.
In addition
, enacting laws and regulations to control the impact of the ever-rising
car
use
will instill the habit of a prudent
car
use
.
Consequently
, it
reduces
atmospheric pollutants released by cars.
In conclusion
,
Even though
some
may oppose the limitation of
car
use
, I
strongly
agree
with the notion due to the serious environmental damage it can cause.
Therefore
, it is
important
to implore
other
methods of conveying
people
and
goods
, taking note of the
positive
effects such as, a healthy lifestyle and limited greenhouse effect, and
also
to implement laws against
car
use
.