The number of vehicles have increased over the years, and it has being speculated that 29 million vehicles will be moving on British roads and highways by 2030. I strongly support the utilization of other transport methods, and the institution of legislation on car use and ownership due to the various dangers it could pose.
Opponents of car use limitation may say that road transport is convenient and cost effective. They may claim that it saves them the hustle and bustle of moving to different destinations as regards high cost of other travel means but they fail to see the environmental hazards excessive car use can cause. This is because the exhaust fumes from these automobiles contain toxic gases such as carbon monoxide and nitrous oxide. Thus, when these gases are getting increasingly released into the atmosphere, they can cause global warming.
Furthermore, the use of other transport means can have beneficial health effects and environmental benefits. This is as a result of increased physical exercise which minimizes a sedentary lifestyle and has limited air pollution. For instance, in Norway, it was reported that the culture of biking amongst the populace has greatly impacted the air quality. Hence, other transport means are encouraged. In addition, enacting laws and regulations to control the impact of the ever-rising car use will instill the habit of a prudent car use. Consequently, it reduces atmospheric pollutants released by cars.
In conclusion, Even though some may oppose the limitation of car use, I strongly agree with the notion due to the serious environmental damage it can cause. Therefore, it is important to implore other methods of conveying people and goods, taking note of the positive effects such as, a healthy lifestyle and limited greenhouse effect, and also to implement laws against car use. 
The number of vehicles  
have
 increased over the years, and it has  
being speculated
 that 29 million vehicles will be moving on British roads and highways by 2030. I  
strongly
 support the utilization of  
other
  transport
 methods, and the institution of legislation on  
car
  use
 and ownership due to the various  
dangers
 it could pose.
Opponents of  
car
  use
 limitation may say that road  
transport
 is convenient and cost effective. They may claim that it saves them the hustle and bustle of moving to  
different
 destinations as regards high cost of  
other
 travel means  
but
 they fail to  
see
 the environmental hazards excessive  
car
  use
 can cause. This is  
because
 the exhaust fumes from these automobiles contain toxic gases such as carbon monoxide and nitrous oxide.  
Thus
, when these gases are getting  
increasingly
 released into the atmosphere, they can cause global warming. 
Furthermore
, the  
use
 of  
other
  transport
 means can have beneficial health effects and environmental benefits. This is  
as a result
 of increased physical exercise which minimizes a sedentary lifestyle and has limited air pollution.  
For instance
, in Norway, it  
was reported
 that the culture of biking amongst the populace has  
greatly
 impacted the air quality.  
Hence
,  
other
  transport
 means  
are encouraged
.  
In addition
, enacting laws and regulations to control the impact of the ever-rising  
car
  use
 will instill the habit of a prudent  
car
  use
.  
Consequently
, it  
reduces
 atmospheric pollutants released by cars. 
In conclusion
,  
Even though
  some
 may oppose the limitation of  
car
  use
, I  
strongly
  agree
 with the notion due to the serious environmental damage it can cause.  
Therefore
, it is  
important
 to implore  
other
 methods of conveying  
people
 and  
goods
, taking note of the  
positive
 effects such as, a healthy lifestyle and limited greenhouse effect, and  
also
 to implement laws against  
car
  use
.