The editor of the local newspaper proposed to hire more old and experienced journalists for more increase in their subscribers and gradually decrease the younger employees. The premises of the author has myriad of loopholes and I am going to present them.
First of all, the author told that three years ago their current subscribers report about the quality and now they gained thirteen percent more subscriber. But the first void is done they actually increase subscribers, where are the proofs that subscribers were increased in three years, what were the number of subscribers three years ago. The author also claims that the readers rated them higher, but the question is the number of readers rated them higher, are the numbers increased or the same as before. the author does not give any proper evidence to bolster his or her claims.
The second point the author told that they need more experienced and old journalists and pare new ones. The question is that, are they sure the old journalists are qualified writer. Maybe the new employees are better qualified than old employees. Maybe new journalists only lack experience and they only need a little bit of training to suave on the areas.
The third paradoxical point author present is, hire more old employees and fire younger ones. This a paradox because if new workers do not get works how could they experienced and there are always limited resources of experienced workers.
In the end, the author gave us some pragmatic claims and evidence full of voids. The author should have provided more figures and data to reinforces his or her evidences.
The editor of the local newspaper proposed to hire more
old
and
experienced
journalists
for more increase in their
subscribers
and
gradually
decrease the younger
employees
. The premises of the
author
has myriad of
loopholes and
I am going to present them.
First of all
, the
author
told
that three years ago their
current
subscribers
report about the quality and
now
they gained thirteen percent more
subscriber
.
But
the
first
void
is done
they actually increase
subscribers
, where are the proofs that
subscribers
were increased
in three years, what were the number of
subscribers
three years ago. The
author
also
claims that the readers rated them higher,
but
the question is the number of readers rated them higher, are the numbers increased or the same as
before
.
the
author
does not give any proper evidence to bolster
his or her
claims.
The second point the
author
told
that they need more
experienced
and
old
journalists
and pare
new
ones. The question is that, are they sure the
old
journalists
are qualified
writer. Maybe the
new
employees
are better qualified than
old
employees
. Maybe
new
journalists
only
lack
experience and
they
only
need a
little bit
of training to suave on the areas.
The third paradoxical point
author
present is, hire more
old
employees
and fire younger ones. This a paradox
because
if
new
workers do not
get
works how could they
experienced
and there are always limited resources of
experienced
workers.
In the
end
, the
author
gave us
some
pragmatic claims and evidence full of voids. The
author
should have provided more figures and data to reinforces
his or her
evidences.