Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Both author and lecturer present the opposite viewpoints about the painting which is attributed to Rembrandt.

Both author and lecturer present the opposite viewpoints about the painting which is attributed to Rembrandt. PVX2p
Both author and lecturer present the opposite viewpoints about the painting which is attributed to Rembrandt. While the passage presents a list of reasons that this painting is not Rembrndt's painting, the professor mentioned contradicting points to refutes the discussed reasons in text. First of all, the writer assumed that this painting is not Rembrndt's work since there is any inconsistency between the lady's clothes, while she has white linen cap, she also wears a fur collar. As the professor asserts, this inconsistency occurred for the sake of the manipulation happened 100-years after the painting is drawn by Rembrandt. As she claims, this painting is not original, and after a hundred year, the fur collar is added to the painting to enhance its value. Secondly, according to Rembrandt's mastery in the light and shadow on the painting, the mistake of the illuminated face of the lady is an indicator that this painting does not belong to Rembrandt. On the other hand, the audio part rejects this assertion, since this error occurred because of the fur collar latterly added to the painting. As she posits, the main clothing of the lady is simple and white which reflects total lights toward her face; therefore, make her face to be completely bright instead of partial shadow. Finally, the passage claims that since the panel of the painting contains several pieces of wood glued together, the panel and painting is not Rembrndt's painting. However, the professor casts doubt on the accuracy of this claim. As she asserts, the original painting is on the one sheet of wood, and extra wood pieces are added later when the fur is drawn on the painting. As she mentioned, the reason for this addition is adding the more grands and value to the painting.
Both author and lecturer present the opposite viewpoints about the
painting
which
is attributed
to Rembrandt. While the passage presents a list of reasons that this
painting
is not
Rembrndt
's
painting
, the professor mentioned contradicting points to
refutes
the discussed reasons in text.

First of all
, the writer assumed that this
painting
is not
Rembrndt
's work since there is any inconsistency between the lady's clothes, while she has white linen cap, she
also
wears a
fur
collar. As the professor asserts, this inconsistency occurred for the sake of the manipulation happened 100-years after the
painting
is drawn
by Rembrandt. As she claims, this
painting
is not original, and after a hundred year, the
fur
collar is
added
to the
painting
to enhance its value.

Secondly
, according to Rembrandt's mastery in the light and shadow on the
painting
, the mistake of the illuminated face of the lady is an indicator that this
painting
does not belong to Rembrandt.
On the other hand
, the audio part rejects this assertion, since this error occurred
because
of the
fur
collar
latterly
added
to the
painting
. As she posits, the main clothing of the lady is simple and white which reflects total lights toward her face;
therefore
,
make
her face to be completely bright
instead
of partial shadow.

Finally
, the passage claims that since the panel of the
painting
contains several pieces of wood glued together, the panel and
painting
is not
Rembrndt
's
painting
.
However
, the professor casts doubt on the accuracy of this claim. As she asserts, the original
painting
is on the one sheet of wood, and extra wood pieces are
added
later when the
fur
is drawn
on the
painting
. As she mentioned, the reason for this addition is adding the more grands and value to the
painting
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Both author and lecturer present the opposite viewpoints about the painting which is attributed to Rembrandt.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
296 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: