How much freedom children should be given on everyday matters is controversial. People who are against allowing boundless liberty to children, believe allowing too much liberty would create selfish individuals in our society while others think it is necessary to nurture creativity and to create self-reliant individuals. I personally believe that parents should neither give absolute immunity to their children nor they should restrain them in every matter - there must be a balance.
On the one hand, permitting children to do whatever they want and letting them chose everything they like on a daily basis would convince youngsters that they can do whatever they like. This is detrimental to the growth of children and those children would become selfish and self centred when they grow up. Scientific research reveals that someone’s childhood experience has a permanent effect on his personality and thinking pattern. This is why parents should make important decisions for their offspring and deter them from doing things that are harmful to their psychological and physical growth.
On the other hand, psychologists express that if parents do not allow their children to pick certain things on their own and restrict them on everything, the children would become fragile-minded and lack confidence. If children cannot choose things they like and do not have any freedom of choice, would end up being less creative than those who were given the immunity to make their own decisions.
To conclude, our society needs more creative and selfless people and that is why we should allow a certain freedom to our child but there should be a boundary of this liberty.
How much freedom
children
should be
given
on everyday matters is controversial.
People
who are against allowing boundless liberty to
children
, believe allowing too much liberty would create selfish individuals in our society while others
think
it is necessary to nurture creativity and to create self-reliant individuals. I
personally
believe that parents should neither give absolute immunity to their
children nor
they should restrain them in every matter
-
there
must
be a balance.
On the one hand, permitting
children
to do whatever they want and letting them chose everything they like on a daily basis would convince youngsters that they can do whatever they like. This is detrimental to the growth of
children
and those
children
would become selfish and
self centred
when they grow up. Scientific research reveals that someone’s childhood experience has a permanent effect on his personality and thinking pattern. This is why parents should
make
important
decisions for their offspring and deter them from doing things that are harmful to their psychological and physical growth.
On the other hand
, psychologists express that if parents do not
allow
their
children
to pick certain things on their
own
and restrict them on everything, the
children
would become fragile-minded and lack confidence. If
children
cannot choose things they like and do not have any freedom of choice, would
end
up being less creative than those who were
given
the immunity to
make
their
own
decisions.
To conclude
, our society needs more creative and selfless
people
and
that is
why we should
allow
a certain freedom
to our child
but
there should be a boundary of this liberty.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes