Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The besl woy for lhe goyernmenf fo solve the problem of lroffic congeslion in cifies, is fo provide free public lronsport 24 hours o doy, 7 doys o week. To whal exfenf do you ogree or drsogree wilh rhis slolemenl?

The besl woy for lhe goyernmenf fo solve the problem of lroffic congeslion in cifies, is fo provide free public lronsport 24 hours o doy, 7 doys o week. To whal exfenf do you ogree or drsogree wilh rhis slolemenl? xx1Ag
Some people opine that the finest solution to urban traffic congestion is to provide free public transport round-the-clock. l, however, beg to differ. I believe that free public transport could help in solving the traffic problem to some extent, but it definitely is not the best solution, as it would lead to many other problems. Undoubtedly, many people, especially daily commuters, would benefit from free public transport. But such a service would be a big burden on the governments, as it would require a lot of funds to maintain such free services. Moreover, a considerable proportion of these services would be wasted, as these would be underused on weekends and midnights. Therefore, it would not be practical on economic grounds to run free public transport. There are numerous ways to solve the traffic problems. The most effective would be to encourage people to use public transport. This could be done by decreasing the fare, increasing the comfort and increasing the frequency of public transport. Obviously, if people do not have to waste time waiting for the bus or train, get comfortable seats and have to pay far less than what they would have to spend on their own personal vehicle, then they would willingly choose public transport, and would not mind paying for it. So this step would prove better than giving a totally free public transport. Additionally, the government could levy toll tax and increase the price of fuel to discourage people from using their own cars. Media could be used to aware people about simple measures like car-pooling. For instance, if five people from one block of flats have to go to the same office, they could each take out their car for one day a week. This would be a win-win situation for the environment and the people. To sum up, having a totally free public transport would not be practical to implement, as it would not be economically viable for the government. Therefore, it would not be the best method. The better methods would be to encourage people to use public transport by making it better.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
opine that the finest solution to urban traffic congestion is to provide
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
free
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
round-the-clock.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
l
,
however
, beg to differ. I believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
free
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
could
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
in solving the traffic problem to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
extent,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
it definitely is not the best solution, as it would lead to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
other problems.

Undoubtedly
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
,
especially
daily commuters, would benefit from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
free
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
such a service would be a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
burden on the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
, as it would require
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
funds to maintain such
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
free
services.
Moreover
, a considerable proportion of these services would
be wasted
, as these would
be underused
on weekends and
Possible spelling mistake found.
midnights
.
Therefore
, it would not be practical on economic grounds to run
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
free
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
. There are numerous ways to solve the traffic problems. The most effective would be to encourage
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
. This could
be done
by decreasing the fare, increasing the comfort and increasing the frequency of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
.
Obviously
, if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
do not
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
waste time waiting for the bus or train,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
comfortable seats and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
pay far less than what they would
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
spend on their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
personal vehicle, then they would
willingly
choose
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
, and would not mind paying for it.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So


this step would prove better than giving a
totally
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
free
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
.
Additionally
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
could levy toll tax and increase the price of fuel to discourage
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
from using their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
cars. Media could be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
to aware
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
about simple measures like car-pooling.
For instance
, if five
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
from one block of flats
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
go to the same office, they could each take out their car for one day a week. This would be a win-win situation for the environment and the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
.

To sum up, having a
totally
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
free
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
would not be practical to implement, as it would not be
economically
viable for the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
.
Therefore
, it would not be the best method. The better methods would be to encourage
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
by making it better.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The besl woy for lhe goyernmenf fo solve the problem of lroffic congeslion in cifies, is fo provide free public lronsport 24 hours o doy, 7 doys o week. To whal exfenf do you ogree or drsogree wilh rhis slolemenl?

Essay
  American English
3 paragraphs
350 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The besl woy for lhe goyernmenf fo solve the problem of lroffic congeslion in cifies, is fo provide free public lronsport 24 hours o doy, 7 doys o week. To whal exfenf do you ogree or drsogree wilh rhis slolemenl?