Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

tell about philosophy or logic

8 Rules of Syllogism - Arguments and Validity - PHILO-notes Whiteboard Edition propositions offered as evidence in the argument: premises proposition for which the evidence is offered: conclusion inductive argument: specefic to general it the premises are true, then is probable that the conclusion is true. example: Ninety percent of othe mongo seeds germinate in day 1 and day 2, ninety percent of the mongo seeds germinate. therefore, ninety percent of the mongo seeds germinate. deductive argument: general to specific if the premises are true, then the conclusion is necessarily true. example: Anybody who kills a person is guilty of a felony. jim kills jack. therefore, jim is guilty of a felony. sullogism: argumets which consist of three propositions that are so ralated. "when the premises are posited as true. the conclusion must also be true. an argument arranged in a specific manner; it contains a major premise, minor premise, and a conclusion. example: all men are mortal. socrates is a man. therefore, socrates is mortal. major premis, minor premise, conclusion major premise: premise that contains the major term. minor premise: premise that contains the minor term. conclusion: third proposition whose meaning and truth are impied in the premises. major term: predicate of the conclusion minor term: subject of the conclusion middle term: remaining term which does not (and cannot) appear in the conclusion all men are mortal. socrates is a man. therefore, socrates is mortal. mortal (major term) socretes (minor term) men (middle term) 8 rules of syllogism 1there should only be theree terms in the syllogism, namely the major ter, the minor term an the middle term. And the meaning of the middle term in the first premise should not be changed in the second premise, otherwise, the syllogism will have 4 terms. 2. the major and
8
Rules
of Syllogism
-
Arguments
and Validity
-
PHILO-notes
Whiteboard Edition

propositions offered as evidence in the
argument
: premises

proposition for which the evidence
is offered
: conclusion

inductive
argument
:
specefic
to general

it the premises are true, then is probable that the conclusion is true.

example
:

Ninety percent of
othe
mongo
seeds germinate in day 1 and day 2, ninety percent of the
mongo
seeds germinate.
therefore
, ninety percent of the
mongo
seeds germinate.

deductive
argument
: general to specific

if the premises are true, then the conclusion is
necessarily
true.

example
:

Anybody who kills a person is guilty of a felony.

jim
kills jack.

therefore
,
jim
is guilty of a felony.

sullogism
:

argumets
which consist of three propositions that are
so
ralated
.

"
when
the premises
are posited
as true.
the
conclusion
must
also
be true.

an
argument
arranged in a specific manner;

it contains a
major
premise
,
minor
premise
, and a conclusion.

example
:

all
men
are mortal.

socrates
is a
man
.

therefore
,
socrates
is mortal.

major
premis
,
minor
premise
, conclusion

major
premise
:
premise
that contains the
major
term.

minor
premise
:
premise
that contains the
minor
term.

conclusion
: third proposition whose meaning and truth are
impied
in the premises.

major
term
: predicate of the conclusion

minor
term
: subject of the conclusion

middle
term
: remaining
term
which does not (and cannot) appear in the conclusion

all
men
are mortal.

socrates
is a
man
.

therefore
,
socrates
is mortal.

mortal
(major
term)

socretes
(minor
term)

men
(middle
term) 8
rules
of syllogism

1there should
only
be
theree
terms in the syllogism,
namely
the
major
ter
, the
minor
term
an
the middle
term
. And the meaning of the middle
term
in the
first
premise
should not be
changed
in the second
premise
,
otherwise
, the syllogism will have 4 terms.

2. the
major
and
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay tell about philosophy or logic

Essay
  American English
29 paragraphs
298 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts