Not being aware about technological monitoring has positive and negatives aspects. In this essay, I will briefly discuss the reasons why the advantages are not greater than the disadvantages on the economic and social aspects when not aware.
Firstly, when a devices capture and transmit information to a company without consente about a specific consumer behaviour, the company will have the power to manipulate the advertizers available to that person, and then achieve more sales in a note very fair way. Some people can advocate that it is a good opition because the consumers will see just what they are interested in, but this is not a fair competition with small businesses because many times they don’t have enough money to invest in such technologies.
Secondly, there is a benefit of tracking terrorism based on the words that people search or speak, and it could prevent attacks of happening. For instance, if the phones of the terrorists that commited the September 11 attack was tracked, the history could be different, and many people could be alive today. However, it could lead to an unecessary vigilance of the private life of the regular citizens. The feeling of being constat watched would limit conversations and really change people’s lives. Furthermore, this situation is often observed in ditatorial governments.
In conclusion, the unawereness when being monitored does not bring benefits to the routine of regular people, especially when trigged by a speach of national security defense. There should be a way of asking permission to monitor people’s behaviour when related to market, or even if the person is suspect of a crime.
Not being aware about technological monitoring has
positive
and negatives aspects. In this essay, I will
briefly
discuss the reasons why the advantages are not greater than the disadvantages on the economic and social aspects when not aware.
Firstly
, when a devices capture and transmit information to a
company
without
consente
about a specific consumer
behaviour
, the
company
will have the power to manipulate the
advertizers
available to that person, and then achieve more sales in a note
very
fair
way.
Some
people
can advocate that it is a
good
opition
because
the consumers will
see
just
what they
are interested
in,
but
this is not a
fair
competition with
small
businesses
because
many
times they don’t have
enough
money to invest in such technologies.
Secondly
, there is a benefit of tracking terrorism based on the words that
people
search or speak, and it could
prevent
attacks of happening.
For instance
, if the phones of the terrorists that
commited
the September 11 attack was
tracked
, the history could be
different
, and
many
people
could be alive
today
.
However
, it could lead to an
unecessary
vigilance of the private life of the regular citizens. The feeling of being
constat
watched
would limit conversations and
really
change
people’s
lives
.
Furthermore
, this situation is
often
observed in
ditatorial
governments
.
In conclusion
, the
unawereness
when
being monitored
does not bring benefits to the routine of regular
people
,
especially
when
trigged
by a
speach
of national security defense. There should be a way of asking permission to monitor
people’s
behaviour
when related to market, or even if the person is suspect of a crime.