The use of technology is increasing rapidly in the modern world. Growing technological influence can even be seen in the classroom by us. The argument that technology will completely replace the teacher in the class is a subject that is both supported and refuted by many people.
Firstly, it is easy to see the progressive rate at which technology can mimic the teaching abilities of human beings. For example, many mobile applications can hold the attention of young children for hours at a time, while concurrently teaching them useful things. Thus, it is clear that on a small scale, machines can act as effective teachers.
However, on the other side of this argument, a teacher-powered by artificial intelligence would have little to no control over its students. For example, children require the watchful eye of a teacher to ensure that they are indeed completing their classwork and not fooling around during the class time. Unfortunately, this is something that a robotic teacher cannot provide. Thus, this makes it clear why the argument that technology will never completely replace the teacher in the classroom could also be possible.
In summary, both sides of the argument regarding the possibility of a technologically driven classroom have strong support. However, after analyzing the two sides, it is clear that the idea of having a class run entirely by a machine is unlikely to materialize anytime soon. As such, the plausibility of technology-based classroom teachers will remain weak. 
The  
use
 of  
technology
 is increasing  
rapidly
 in the modern world. Growing technological influence can even be  
seen
 in the classroom by us. The  
argument
 that  
technology
 will completely replace the  
teacher
 in the  
class
 is a subject  
that is
 both supported and refuted by  
many
  people
. 
Firstly
, it is easy to  
see
 the progressive rate at which  
technology
 can mimic the teaching abilities of human beings.  
For example
,  
many
 mobile applications can hold the attention of young children for hours at a time, while  
concurrently
 teaching them useful things.  
Thus
, it is  
clear
 that on a  
small
 scale, machines can act as effective teachers. 
However
, on the other side of this  
argument
, a teacher-powered by artificial intelligence would have  
little
 to no control over its students.  
For example
, children require the watchful eye of a  
teacher
 to ensure that they are  
indeed
 completing their classwork and not fooling around during the  
class
 time. Unfortunately, this is something that a robotic  
teacher
 cannot provide.  
Thus
, this  
makes
 it  
clear
 why the  
argument
 that  
technology
 will never completely replace the  
teacher
 in the classroom could  
also
 be possible.
In summary, both sides of the  
argument
 regarding the possibility of a  
technologically
 driven classroom have strong support.  
However
, after analyzing the two sides, it is  
clear
 that the  
idea
 of having a  
class
 run  
entirely
 by a machine is unlikely to materialize anytime  
soon
. As such, the plausibility of technology-based classroom  
teachers
 will remain weak.