Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Suppression of forest fires

Suppression of forest fires kYj7d
The reading and the lecture discuss the effects of forest fires. While the former states that the occurrence of these events has more drawbacks, the latter asserts that these fires have more benefits than disadvantages, casting doubts on the claims of the passage. First and foremost, the article indicates that avoiding forest fires implies an improvement in oaks' health. The lecturer, however, states that the suppression of forest fires may produce bad long term effects on forest life. To be specific, she mentions that oaks need light to grow and mature, and that the wilderness management may interfere negatively on this process. In addition, it is mentioned in the passage that fire suppression that vines and low bushes may flourish better when fires are suppressed. In the class, the professor calls into question this assumption. She posits out that it would be difficult for oaks to grow due to the fact that this smaller vegetation would run over the forest, and as a result, there will be more competition for resources. Finally, the author also affirms that wild animals will be benefited, increasing the number of their population. On the other hand, the academic says that the oaks' leaves would die, so there would not be enough food for deers. She elaborates on this pointing out that forest fires release nutrients which can afterward help the development of life in the forest.
The reading and the lecture discuss the effects of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fires
. While the former states that the occurrence of these
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
events
has more drawbacks, the latter asserts that these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fires
have more benefits than disadvantages, casting doubts on the claims of the passage.

First
and foremost, the article indicates that avoiding
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fires
implies an improvement in oaks' health. The lecturer,
however
, states that the suppression of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fires
may produce
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bad
long term effects on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forest
life. To be specific, she mentions that oaks need light to grow and mature, and that the wilderness management may interfere
negatively
on this process.

In addition
, it
is mentioned
in the passage that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
suppression that vines and low bushes may flourish better when
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fires
are suppressed
. In the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
class
, the professor calls into question this assumption. She posits out that it would be difficult for oaks to grow due to the fact that this smaller vegetation would run over the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forest
, and
as a result
, there will be more competition for resources.

Finally
, the author
also
affirms that wild animals will
be benefited
, increasing the number of their population.
On the other hand
, the academic says that the oaks'
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
leaves
would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
die
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
there would not be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
food for
Possible spelling mistake. Did you mean "deer", the plural form of the noun 'deer'?
deers
. She elaborates on this pointing out that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fires
release nutrients which can afterward
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
the development of life in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
forest
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Suppression of forest fires

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
232 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Suppression of forest fires