Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

summarize two different opinions about using airships as new device instead of airplanes

summarize two different opinions about using airships as new device instead of airplanes e3arV
The reading states the advantages of using airships instead of airplanes and helicopters and provides three reasons to support this idea; Nevertheless, the lecturer disagrees with this argument and refutes each of the points made in the reading. To begin with, the author mentions that because balloons barely need engines to rise and move, they consume less fuel. This specific claim is challenged by the professor. He believes that balloons need lighter gases like Hydrogen and helium. Moreover, he adds that each of these gases has problems. For example, Hydrogen is a dangerous gas, and many accidents happened in the past with balloons carrying Hydrogen. Furthermore, while helium is a safe gas, it is expensive and hard to get. Therefore, he believes that finding an easy and economical solution for flights is not practical yet. Secondly, the passage explains that airships can rise and land vertically, so they can be used in places where airplanes cannot reach to carry objects. However, the professor claims that when a balloon wants to pick a log, it should land, lift the heavy packages, and keep its balance. Additionally, he explains that the balloon should be steady encountering solid winds that might crush it to trees. Thus, he thinks a lot of designing ought to be done before it becomes practical to use as a log carrier. Finally, according to the text, airships can be used instead of satellites with a fewer price. The professor opposes this idea, explaining that balloons cannot travel fourteen kilometers to reach the height where satellites are. Thus, they are not ready to use satellites. Furthermore, he states that powerful winds are blowing in high latitudes, and balloons need to use fuel to stay in front of those winds, prohibiting moving. As a result, airships need to descend once a while to gain fuel and go back to the atmosphere. He thinks this is costly and requires telecommunication apparatus, so it is not as easy as the passage mentioned.
The reading states the advantages of using
airships
instead
of airplanes and helicopters and provides three reasons to support this
idea
;
Nevertheless
, the lecturer disagrees with this argument and refutes each of the points made in the reading.

To
begin
with, the author mentions that
because
balloons
barely
need
engines to rise and
move
, they consume less fuel. This specific claim
is challenged
by the professor. He believes that
balloons
need
lighter gases like Hydrogen and helium.
Moreover
, he
adds
that each of these gases has problems.
For example
, Hydrogen is a
dangerous
gas, and
many
accidents happened in the past with
balloons
carrying Hydrogen.
Furthermore
, while helium is a safe gas, it is expensive and
hard
to
get
.
Therefore
, he believes that finding an easy and economical solution for flights is not practical
yet
.

Secondly
, the passage
explains
that
airships
can rise and land
vertically
,
so
they can be
used
in places where airplanes cannot reach to carry objects.
However
, the professor claims that when a
balloon
wants to pick a log, it should land, lift the heavy packages, and
keep
its balance.
Additionally
, he
explains
that the
balloon
should be steady encountering solid winds that might crush it to trees.
Thus
, he
thinks
a lot of
designing ought to
be done
before
it becomes practical to
use
as a log carrier.

Finally
, according to the text,
airships
can be
used
instead
of satellites with a fewer price. The professor opposes this
idea
, explaining that
balloons
cannot travel fourteen kilometers to reach the height where satellites are.
Thus
, they are not ready to
use
satellites.
Furthermore
, he states that powerful winds are blowing in high latitudes, and
balloons
need
to
use
fuel to stay in front of those winds, prohibiting moving.
As a result
,
airships
need
to descend once a while to gain fuel and go back to the atmosphere. He
thinks
this is costly and requires telecommunication apparatus,
so
it is not as easy as the passage mentioned.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay summarize two different opinions about using airships as new device instead of airplanes

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
330 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: