The reading and lecture are both about < span class=" hiddenGrammarError" pre=" about " > < /span> the Salton Sea salinity, Which this salinity is harmful for fish and bird populations. The author of reading believes that there are some solutions to reduce the salt. The lecture challenges the statement made by the author. The professor is of the opinion that these ways are impractical.
First of all, the author suggests that salt can remove by desalination facilities because this system can evaporate water into steam while salt would be left behind. This idea is challenged by the lecture. She says that pump water into facilities is risky, because with this work salt and other materials change to solid form then the wind can spread these materials like selenium into the air. Therefore, people breathe the air which is deleterious for them; consequently, this action is not useful.
Secondly, the writer contends that can help from Water Ocean because this water has less salt from than the lake. The article notes the water ocean should inject into the lake by canals. The lecture, however, rebuts this by asserting that the government has not enough resources to build canals or pipelines. She elaborates on this by mentioning that the nearest shoreline has a long distance from the Salton Sea, so this way does need long canals, while the government cannot support to build the constructions for this distance.
Finally, it is stated in the article that would be to control salinity by walls. These walls separate the lake to different sections that small parts have much more salinity than large parts. The lecture, on the other hand, posits that the Salton Sea is located in a region that experiences geologically actions such as an earthquake. So, in this condition with first quake all walls fall down, then the water of low salinity sections mix with high salinity segments.
The reading and
lecture
are both about
<
; span
class
=
"
;
hiddenGrammarError"
;
pre
=
"
; about
"
;
>
;
<
; /
span>
; the Salton Sea salinity, Which this salinity is harmful for fish and bird populations. The author of reading believes that there are
some
solutions to
reduce
the
salt
.
The
lecture
challenges the statement made by the author.
The
professor is of the opinion that these ways are impractical.
First of all
, the author suggests that
salt
can remove by desalination facilities
because
this system can evaporate
water
into steam while
salt
would be
left
behind. This
idea
is challenged
by the
lecture
. She says that pump
water
into facilities is risky,
because
with this work
salt
and other materials
change
to solid form then the wind can spread these materials like selenium into the air.
Therefore
,
people
breathe the air which is deleterious for them;
consequently
, this action is not useful.
Secondly
, the writer contends that can
help
from
Water
Ocean
because
this
water
has less
salt
from than the lake. The article notes the
water
ocean should inject into the lake by canals. The
lecture
,
however
, rebuts this by asserting that the
government
has not
enough
resources to build canals or pipelines. She elaborates on this by mentioning that the nearest shoreline has a long distance from the Salton Sea,
so
this way does need long canals, while the
government
cannot support to build the constructions for this distance.
Finally
, it
is stated
in the article that would be to control salinity by walls. These walls separate the lake to
different
sections that
small
parts have much more salinity than large parts. The
lecture
,
on the other hand
, posits that the Salton Sea
is located
in a region that experiences
geologically
actions such as an earthquake.
So
, in this condition with
first
quake all walls fall down, then the
water
of low salinity sections mix with high salinity segments.