Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

what do you think about using strike rules to handling and storage of coal ash products?

what do you think about using strike rules to handling and storage of coal ash products? RNWGW

The reading states that representatives of power companies argue that new regulations for controlling and storing coal ash are unnecessary and presents three reasons to defend their allegation. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes all three episodes of evidence mentioned in the passage. Firstly, the reading says that strike environmental regulations already exist, in contrary, the speaker declares that the regulation we have now are not really sufficient. For example, under the current regulation, only new pond or landfilled of company required to use liner. Whereas old ones demand disposal sites and they have caused significant damage. And due to harmful chemical coal ash leaked to groundwater and contaminated drinking water, we absolutely need strikes regulation. Secondly, the reading states that create strike rules might discourage the recycle of coal ash in to other products. Nevertheless, the speaker contends that strike rules for handling won't mean to stop using recycle coal ash products. For example, Mercury is hazardous material and it's storage for long time. There isn't any concern about it because of safely recycle. Finally, the writer discusses about public complain of price of electricity because of highly increasing costs of power companies. Again the speaker opposes this idea by pay attention to the results that is well worthy extra cost. According to her, by implementing these rules would be 15 billion dollars increased that by do the math, it is increasing the bill for every family just one percent that isn't big price to pay for having cleaner environment.

The reading states that representatives of power This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :enterprisescorporations
companies
 argue that new You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcontrolmanagementgovernancearrangementadjustmentsupervision
regulations
 for controlling and storing coal ash are unnecessary and presents three reasons to defend their allegation. On the other hand
, the lecturer refutes all three episodes of evidence mentioned in the passage.

Firstly
, the reading says that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withknockcrashpummelbeatdrivecollide
strike
 environmental You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcontrolmanagementgovernancearrangementadjustmentsupervision
regulations
 already exist, in contrary, the speaker declares that the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcontrolmanagementgovernancearrangementadjustmentsupervision
regulation
 we have This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :nowadays
now
Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: "been".been
are
 not really
 sufficient. For example
, under the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :contemporarymodern
current
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcontrolmanagementgovernancearrangementadjustmentsupervision
regulation
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 new pond or Possible spelling mistake found.land filled
landfilled
 of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :enterprisecorporation
company
 required to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 liner. Whereas This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ancientagedmature
old
 ones demand disposal Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).sites, and
sites and
 they have caused significant damage. And due to harmful chemical coal ash leaked to groundwater and contaminated drinking water, we absolutely
 need You use this word too often, consider replacing it withknockcrashpummelbeatdrivecollide
strikes
 regulation.

Secondly
, the reading states that create You use this word too often, consider replacing it withknockcrashpummelbeatdrivecollide
strike
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirements
rules
 might discourage the recycle of coal ash in to other products. Nevertheless
, the speaker contends that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withknockcrashpummelbeatdrivecollide
strike
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirements
rules
 for handling won't mean to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :terminateceasediscontinue
stop
 using recycle coal ash products. For example
, Mercury is hazardous material and it's storage for long time. There isn't any concern about it This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of safely
 recycle.

Finally
, the writer Did you mean simply "discusses public"? You do not need the word "about" here.discusses public
discusses about public
 complain of price of electricity This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of highly
 increasing costs of power This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :enterprisescorporations
companies
. Again the speaker opposes this This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
 by pay attention to the results that is
 well worthy extra cost. According to her, by implementing these This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirements
rules
 would be 15 billion dollars increased The verb 'do' is plural. Did you mean: "that by does"? Did you use a verb instead of a noun?that by does
that by do
 the math, it is increasing the bill for every family This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 one percent that isn't This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hugeenormousgiganticvast
big
 price to pay for having cleaner environment. 