The article introduces the topic of a painting which was made by Rembrandt, a one of the most famous Dutch painters in the seventeenth century. The paintwork, portrait of an Ederly woman in a White Bonnet, is not a work of Rembrandt according to the reading passage. However, the lecturer in the listening passage disagrees. she believes that the picture was painted by Rembrandt and refutes each of the claims in the text.
In the paragraphs, the author begin by stating that Rembrandt could not paint a portrait of a woman who has an incongruence of her clothes because he pay attention on the details. In this case, the woman looks like as a servant but carry a luxurious fur collar. The professor argues this statement and mention the cause of this error: the picture was altered. As a result, the original version did not have inconsistency so it is true that it was created by Rembrandt.
The book also propose that light and shadow do not fit together as in the other work of Rembrandt. The speaker refers to her previous argument and add that this is related on the disturbance of the original work. Furthermore, she tells that the restauration of the picture also show the elements have fit very well.
Another reason why the author feels that the paintwork was not made by Rembrandt is that panel was joined by several pieces of wood, something that nobody finds in other work of Rembrandt. The professor is doubtful that this is right. She suggests that the change of main painting increases the size of it. In consequence, person who did that changes put several pieces of wood together in order to raises the panel.
The article introduces the topic of a painting which
was made
by Rembrandt, a one of the most
famous
Dutch painters in the seventeenth century. The paintwork, portrait of an
Ederly
woman in a White Bonnet, is not a
work
of Rembrandt according to the reading passage.
However
, the lecturer in the listening passage disagrees.
she
believes that the picture
was painted
by Rembrandt and refutes each of the claims in the text.
In the paragraphs, the author
begin
by stating that Rembrandt could not paint a portrait of a woman who has an
incongruence
of her clothes
because
he pay attention on the
details
.
In this case
, the woman looks like as a servant
but
carry a luxurious fur collar. The professor argues this statement and mention the cause of this error: the picture
was altered
.
As a result
, the original version did not have inconsistency
so
it is true that it
was created
by Rembrandt.
The book
also
propose that light and shadow do not fit together as in the other
work
of Rembrandt. The speaker refers to her previous argument and
add
that this
is related
on the disturbance of the original
work
.
Furthermore
, she
tells
that the
restauration
of the picture
also
show
the elements have fit
very
well.
Another reason why the author feels that the paintwork was not made by Rembrandt is that panel was
joined
by several pieces of wood, something that nobody finds in other
work
of Rembrandt. The professor is doubtful that this is right. She suggests that the
change
of main painting increases the size of it. In consequence, person who did that
changes
put several pieces of wood together in order to
raises
the panel.
Funny
Love
Wow
Angry
Sad