Both the lecture and the reading concern online universities. The author offers three hypotheses concerning online university drawbacks. The speaker opposes the arguments of the article. He believes that education at online universities has numerous advantages
According to the reading, in terms of academics, online universities are below regular universities. The article mentions that class tasks are simpler and the effort is not too high. Moreover, students have less time to learn because they are emailed assignments and complete them on their own time one day in advance. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that employers may easily assess a university's reputation by examining their internet data and inferring their reputation. Additionally, he points out that online universities are frequently more accurate and up-to-date than traditional universities.
Secondly, the author suggests that graduates from online universities are socially inept. These things are highly significant in the professional work world. The lecturer, however, asserts that online communication skills are also acquired by students at online universities, which are especially crucial at work because more and more organizations are becoming worldwide dependent on internet communication.
Finally, the author posits that online universities have no trustworthiness. The author contends that the learner's test without the instructor directly supervising, the trick may have happened. In contrast, the lecturer’s stance is that A variety of precautions exist to ensure that fraud is not committed. He notes that online testing is frequently conceived to prevent students from returning to modify their responses.
Both the lecture and the reading concern
online
universities
. The
author
offers three hypotheses concerning
online
university
drawbacks. The speaker opposes the arguments of the article. He believes that education at
online
universities
has numerous advantages
According to the reading, in terms of academics,
online
universities
are below regular
universities
. The article mentions that
class
tasks are simpler and the effort is not too high.
Moreover
, students have less time to learn
because
they
are emailed
assignments and complete them on their
own
time one day in advance. This specific argument
is challenged
by the lecturer. He claims that employers may
easily
assess a university's reputation by examining their internet data and inferring their reputation.
Additionally
, he points out that
online
universities
are
frequently
more accurate and up-to-date than traditional universities.
Secondly
, the
author
suggests that graduates from
online
universities
are
socially
inept. These things are
highly
significant in the professional work world. The lecturer,
however
, asserts that
online
communication
skills
are
also
acquired by students at
online
universities
, which are
especially
crucial at work
because
more and more organizations are becoming worldwide dependent on internet communication.
Finally
, the
author
posits that
online
universities
have no trustworthiness. The
author
contends that the learner's
test
without the instructor
directly
supervising, the trick may have happened.
In contrast
, the lecturer’s stance is that A variety of precautions exist to ensure that fraud is not committed. He notes that
online
testing is
frequently
conceived to
prevent
students from returning to modify their responses.