Twenty first century has seen a tremendous rising trend of mobile phone usage. Since some cellular device users have been found to be antisocial, the idea of banning its use in certain places has also been raised. The banning of smoking is being referenced in this regard. This essay will discuss about disagreeing the idea through discussing the fallacies in brief.
Mobile phones have successfully been updated in recent past to become a part and parcel of our daily life. Ensuring the prime purpose of communication, it is also being used for news update, entertainment and knowledge development. The public can get in touch with their friends and families much more easily than before, which in fact aids the community to become more social. Although arguments can be made about mobile devices taking over the newspaper usage, citizens are now getting more updated than before through regular updates from news applications. Web pages, applications & video sharing platforms have become popular hubs for knowledge seekers who can easily access the huge contents available on the web. For example, through YouTube videos students are learning topics in a more convenient way.
On the contrary, smoking is regarded harmful towards health by almost all. Not only active smokers but also who are around them, carry almost the same risk of having lung diseases and even cancer. According to many scientific reports, lung cancer is now a leading cause of death all around the world. So, banning cell phone use in places is not the same as banning something that is alarming to health.
To conclude, no restriction should be there for mobile phone use. Steps should rather be taken to provide with contents that will enhance learning, social harmony and revival.
Twenty
first
century has
seen
a tremendous rising trend of mobile
phone
usage. Since
some
cellular device users have
been found
to be antisocial, the
idea
of
banning
its
use
in certain places has
also
been raised
. The
banning
of smoking is
being referenced
in this regard. This essay will
discuss about disagreeing
the
idea
through discussing the fallacies
in brief
.
Mobile
phones
have
successfully
been updated
in recent past to become a part and parcel of our daily life. Ensuring the prime purpose of communication, it is
also
being
used
for news update, entertainment and knowledge development. The public can
get
in touch with their friends and families much more
easily
than
before
, which in fact aids the community to become more social. Although arguments can
be made
about mobile devices taking over the newspaper usage, citizens are
now
getting more updated than
before
through regular updates from news applications. Web pages, applications & video sharing platforms have become popular hubs for knowledge seekers who can
easily
access the huge contents available on the web.
For example
, through YouTube videos students are learning topics in a more convenient way.
On the contrary
, smoking
is regarded
harmful towards health by almost all. Not
only
active smokers
but
also
who are around them, carry almost the same
risk
of having lung diseases and even cancer. According to
many
scientific reports, lung cancer is
now
a leading cause of death all around the world.
So
,
banning
cell
phone
use
in places is not the same as
banning
something
that is
alarming to health.
To conclude
, no restriction should be there for mobile
phone
use
. Steps should
rather
be taken
to provide with contents that will enhance learning, social harmony and revival.