It is often argued that pupils are able to easily study abroad is more advantageous even if there are a few cons for it. I completely agree with this opinion and think that pupils should prefer the foreign institutions which represents better quality, thus we will have multi-cultural experienced people in the future.
Firstly, I believe that qualified alumni from abroad institutions contribute their origin country’s improvements with visionary view, international experience which is great opportunity. After the graduation, the pupils would be multi-cultural, qualified person and have networks with foreign companies by doing internships or working experiences that could be beneficial for local industry and economy. When they return their home, they can rise fresh graduates as a mentor and aid to improve local systems to be better those leads to a general development for everybody. That’s why, countries might be level up by their temporary immigrates’ contributions.
Secondly, there are some concerns on it, advanced states such as USA, European Countries, China, Russia know persuade talented higher-education pupils to stay and work in their companies, can act as head-hunter due to lack of qualified employee. It leads to dramatically lost talented local people. For example, according to research, when globalization comes our life, it shows the number of young people who get their master's education abroad and be permanent there has increased and developing countries are badly affected as economical and productional. Therefore, it contains critical risk that can cause fearful future for third countries.
To conclude, I strongly believe that having more opportunity for study abroad’s pros outrace the cons, reason of that is eventually some of individuals come back their home and work for the progress of their nations.
It is
often
argued that
pupils
are able to
easily
study
abroad
is more advantageous even if there are a few cons for it. I completely
agree
with this opinion and
think
that
pupils
should prefer the foreign institutions which represents better quality,
thus
we will have multi-cultural experienced
people
in the future.
Firstly
, I believe that qualified alumni from
abroad
institutions contribute their origin
country’s
improvements with visionary view, international experience which is great opportunity. After the graduation, the
pupils
would be multi-cultural, qualified person and have networks with foreign
companies
by doing internships or working experiences that could be beneficial for local industry and economy. When they return their home, they can rise fresh graduates as a mentor and aid to
improve
local systems to be better those leads to a general development for everybody. That’s why,
countries
might be level up by their temporary immigrates’ contributions.
Secondly
, there are
some
concerns on it, advanced states such
as USA
, European
Countries
, China, Russia know persuade talented higher-education
pupils
to stay and work in their
companies
, can act as head-hunter due to lack of qualified employee. It leads to
dramatically
lost talented local
people
.
For example
, according to research, when globalization
comes
our life, it
shows
the number of young
people
who
get
their master's education
abroad
and be permanent there has increased and developing
countries
are
badly
affected
as economical and
productional
.
Therefore
, it contains critical
risk
that can cause fearful future for third countries.
To conclude
, I
strongly
believe that having more opportunity for study
abroad’s
pros outrace the cons, reason of
that is
eventually
some of individuals
come
back their home and work for the progress of their nations.