Nowadays, it is acknowledged that students from suburban areas find it tough to receive higher education. Whether it should be made easier for them to access university education becomes an ongoing concern, which incurs a highly-charged debate.
Obviously, higher education opportunities bring about benefits to students in multiple ways. For example, to receive higher education becomes increasingly important to senior high school graduates, partly becasue it determines if they have the competitive edge in the job market, and partly because it is seen as a guarantee of a certain level of the mental ability, from the computer literacy that is required by the most employers to the capacities of acquiring new knowledge the soonest possible which is valued by the most workplaces. With a university degree, students from rural areas will obtain a job easily, thereby bettering their living conditions and their family as well.
Higher education also, however, tend to impose a heavy burden on their families since the relenting rise in the tuition fees which are - increasingly beyond those families’ ability to afford. In addition, with the mounting evidence, a university degree is not always a guarantee of seizing a decent job; therefore, their living conditions are likely to worse off by not able to earn back their tuition fee after graduation. In this way, some people argue, students from rural areas are not well-advised to pursue a university degree. But I perceive their desire to further their education should not be disrespected and the government should subsidise them to receive higher education.
In conclusion, university education should be made fair to everyone, predicated only on their academic performance and mental abilities, rather than their financial capacities and the government should subsidise those students in need.
Nowadays, it
is acknowledged
that
students
from suburban areas find it tough to receive higher
education
. Whether it should
be made
easier for them to access
university
education
becomes an ongoing concern, which incurs a
highly
-charged debate.
Obviously
, higher
education
opportunities bring about benefits to
students
in multiple ways.
For example
, to receive higher
education
becomes
increasingly
important
to senior high school graduates, partly
becasue
it determines if they have the competitive edge in the job market, and partly
because
it is
seen
as a guarantee of a certain level of the mental ability, from the computer literacy that
is required
by the most employers to the capacities of acquiring new knowledge the soonest possible which
is valued
by the most workplaces. With a
university
degree,
students
from rural areas will obtain a job
easily
, thereby bettering their living conditions and their family
as well
.
Higher
education
also
,
however
, tend to impose a heavy burden on their families since the relenting rise in the tuition fees which are
-
increasingly
beyond those families’ ability to afford.
In addition
, with the mounting evidence, a
university
degree is not always a guarantee of seizing a decent job;
therefore
, their living conditions are likely to worse off by not able to earn back their tuition fee after graduation. In this way,
some
people
argue,
students
from rural areas are not well-advised to pursue a
university
degree.
But
I perceive their desire to
further
their
education
should not
be disrespected
and the
government
should
subsidise
them to receive higher education.
In conclusion
,
university
education
should
be made
fair
to everyone, predicated
only
on their academic performance and mental abilities,
rather
than their financial capacities and the
government
should
subsidise
those
students
in need.