In this sets of materials, both the reading and the lecture discuss whether " Spanking is effective as a method to punish children or not" . Whereas, the article supports Spanking, the listener disregards this idea and presents three reasons that she thinks overweight those in the reading.
First, in the article the author says that by using sparking, children come to understand that the action was wrong, thus they won't repeat it again. Notwithstanding, the listener disagrees with this idea, and instead suggests that children cannot understand that in reality they were sparked due to a bad behavior. Furthermore, the listener explains that parents should seat with children and explain them that the conduct carried on was not adequate. In this way, children will learn.
Second, the reading claims that according to some studies, sparking is more beneficial and effective than other methods like ''Time out" because with sparking, for sure children won't repeat the bad action again. On the other hand, the listener considers that this is not true. Instead, she thinks that " Time out" is better because this will give time to children to think that they did something wrong. In fact, studies demonstrated that ''Time out" is a better tool.
Third, the article posits that spanking connect children with the bad action, so they can infer that their act was bad. Nevertheless, the listener thinks something different and states that sparking can be forgotten in five minutes by children. Even, children don't watch this method as a punishment to correct them, instead they consider that parents are violent to them. So, in the future, children are prompted to carried on the same violent behavior on others.
In
this
sets of materials, both the reading and the lecture discuss whether
"
; Spanking is effective as a method to punish
children
or
not"
;
.
Whereas, the article supports Spanking, the
listener
disregards this
idea
and presents three reasons that she
thinks
overweight those in the reading.
First
, in the article the author says that by using
sparking
,
children
come
to understand that the action was
wrong
,
thus
they won't repeat it again. Notwithstanding, the
listener
disagrees with this
idea
, and
instead
suggests that
children
cannot understand that in reality they
were sparked
due to a
bad
behavior.
Furthermore
, the
listener
explains
that parents should seat with
children
and
explain
them
that the conduct carried on was not adequate. In this way,
children
will learn.
Second, the reading claims that according to
some
studies,
sparking
is more beneficial and effective than other methods like ''Time
out"
;
because
with
sparking
, for sure
children
won't repeat the
bad
action again.
On the other hand
, the
listener
considers that this is not true.
Instead
, she
thinks
that
"
; Time
out"
; is better
because
this will give time to
children
to
think
that they did something
wrong
. In fact, studies demonstrated that ''Time
out"
; is a better tool.
Third, the article posits that spanking connect
children
with the
bad
action,
so
they can infer that their act was
bad
.
Nevertheless
, the
listener
thinks
something
different
and states that
sparking
can
be forgotten
in five minutes by
children
. Even,
children
don't
watch
this method as a punishment to correct them,
instead
they consider that parents are violent to them.
So
, in the future,
children
are prompted
to carried on the same violent behavior on others.