Both the reading and the lecture discuss whether '' nuclear energy might provide a good alternative for our future or not. Whereas, the reading passage says that it's an excellent idea to use nuclear energy and provides three reasons, the listener disagrees. He posits that these reasons are not reliable.
In the first place, the reading explains that nuclear energy cost much less to produce compared with the traditional methods of producing energy. Nevertheless, the listener doesn't support this idea, he believes that in order to build a nuclear system the government has to invest a huge amounts of money. In addition, in some countries legislation requires that an extra budget need to be created just to compensate if an accidents happen.
The second, the reading states that nuclear systems are secured for people because their are built under strict measures, in other words, radiation doesn't escape. Notwithstanding, the listener doesn't agree, he claims that perhaps this measure might prevent any future problems, but they are not hundred percent reliable. For instance, PA nuclear accident was an example of this. This was a minor accident that embraced three miles and didn't pose any treats to humans, nevertheless it costed millions of dollars. In addition people psychological status was harm.
The third, the reading posits that radioactive wastes are easily manage. On the other hand, the listener thinks that they're not because they posits a treat to human beings. Even if they are reused for other activities they might produce other elements such as Plutonium that might poisons people. These waste materials are also bury and they represent a danger to the environment.
Both the
reading
and the lecture discuss whether '' nuclear
energy
might
provide a
good
alternative for our future or not. Whereas, the
reading
passage says that it's an excellent
idea
to
use
nuclear
energy
and provides three reasons, the
listener
disagrees. He posits that these reasons are not reliable.
In the
first
place, the
reading
explains
that nuclear
energy
cost much less to produce compared with the traditional methods of producing
energy
.
Nevertheless
, the
listener
doesn't support this
idea
, he believes that in order to build a nuclear system the
government
has to
invest a huge
amounts
of money.
In addition
, in
some
countries
legislation requires that an extra budget need to
be created
just
to compensate if
an accidents
happen.
The second, the
reading
states that nuclear systems
are secured
for
people
because
their
are built
under strict measures, in
other
words, radiation doesn't escape. Notwithstanding, the
listener
doesn't
agree
, he claims that perhaps this measure
might
prevent
any future problems,
but
they are not
hundred
percent reliable.
For instance
, PA nuclear accident was an example of this. This was a minor accident that embraced three miles and didn't pose any treats to humans,
nevertheless
it costed millions of dollars. In
addition
people
psychological status was harm.
The third, the
reading
posits that radioactive wastes are
easily
manage
. On the
other
hand, the
listener
thinks
that they're not
because
they
posits
a treat to human beings. Even if they
are reused
for
other
activities they
might
produce
other
elements such as Plutonium that
might
poisons
people
. These waste materials are
also
bury and
they represent a
danger
to the environment.