In educational field, there has been divided view of teaching schemes of the pupils during their schooling. Some intellectuals believe that students should be taught special subjects in deepth, while others concern that wide range of subjects should be taught to students by professors. The positive sides of both views are discussed further. To begin, the first view is accent the qualitative study of few essential subjects. The practise would increase interest of students in vital subjects, as well as, provoke students to gain speacial information which is essential for their study. Moreover, benefits of few subjects help to elevate efficiency of learning. This action could lead to gain ample knowledge of their selected subjects without pressure. For example, the survey showed that most students feel depression due to pressure of studying wide range of subjects. Finally, learning few subjects would inspire the age of fifteen for the qualitative knowledge without stress. On the other hand, the second view is considering to teach much subjects to pupils before they do further education. During the elementary school, pupils are taught to many basic subjects by schools in order to build flourished career such as well promotion. In addition, Parents induce their adolescence to learn many subjects, although, wide range of subjects would create more pressure. This situation would cause to loss of efficiency of learning and interesting. In conclusion, both the patterns of learning have their specific advantages. In my personal opinion, the former view is more beneficial for students, especially, it would lucrative for the elementary school pupils.
In educational field, there has
been divided
view
of teaching schemes of the
pupils
during their schooling.
Some
intellectuals believe that
students
should
be taught
special
subjects
in
deepth
, while others concern that wide range of
subjects
should
be taught
to
students
by professors. The
positive
sides of both
views
are discussed
further
. To
begin
, the
first
view
is accent the qualitative study of few essential
subjects
. The
practise
would increase interest of
students
in vital
subjects
,
as well
as, provoke
students
to gain
speacial
information which is essential for their study.
Moreover
, benefits of few
subjects
help
to elevate efficiency of
learning
. This action could lead to gain ample knowledge of their selected
subjects
without pressure.
For example
, the survey
showed
that most
students
feel depression due to pressure of studying wide range of
subjects
.
Finally
,
learning
few
subjects
would inspire the age of fifteen for the qualitative knowledge without
stress
.
On the other hand
, the second
view
is considering to teach
much
subjects
to
pupils
before
they do
further
education. During the elementary school,
pupils
are taught
to
many
basic
subjects
by schools in order to build flourished career such
as well
promotion.
In addition
, Parents induce their adolescence to learn
many
subjects
, although, wide range of
subjects
would create more pressure. This situation would cause to loss of efficiency of
learning
and interesting.
In conclusion
, both the patterns of
learning
have
their specific advantages. In my personal opinion, the former
view
is more beneficial for
students
,
especially
, it
would lucrative
for the elementary school
pupils
.