Every country has its own reason as to bid worldwide sports event. Olympic games is a prime example. It is often argued that such games are money wasting expensive and even not efficient, while others not agree with this point of view. In my opinion, I disagree that, globally organized sports events are beneficial for the economy not only hosting country but also all over the world. This essay will discuss both judgements as well.
It is clear that the well-planned theme for these types of activities makes nation's pride, financial benefit and tourism, that will be a positive impact rather than opponent's views. In other words, fans, or visitors those who are coming in Olympic city would publish their experience in hostess traditional cultures, foods as well as tourist zones, which would likely to have their economic value in higher position even after the event. For example, one of the Olympic city as Sydney had risen Australian tourism standard and economy after the Olympic games than before.
On the other hand, many disagree and feel that such programmes have negative consequences. As their perspective, government are spending huge amount for such sports event and, which is incompetent as well. Despite this, a well organization committee can disburse money for certain concerned areas namely hostage facilities, accompanied with tourist zones, tax for some services, proper selection of game field and so on. Therefore, hosting country can get back money which they spend. For instance, 2016 Rio Olympic make Brazil's infrastructure and standard of economy than previous years.
To conclude, international based sports events are insisted to put more money on that; nevertheless, having a well management team can survive such adverse ramifications by respective field volunteers. However, as long as worldwide sports event leaders should be wary of this, there are no chance to blame on cost or money wastage.
Every country has its
own
reason as to bid worldwide
sports
event
. Olympic
games
is a prime example. It is
often
argued that such
games
are
money
wasting expensive and even not efficient, while others not
agree
with this point of view. In my opinion, I disagree that, globally organized
sports
events
are beneficial for the economy not
only
hosting country
but
also
all over the world. This essay will discuss both judgements
as well
.
It is
clear
that the well-planned theme for these types of activities
makes
nation's pride, financial benefit and tourism, that will be a
positive
impact
rather
than opponent's views.
In other words
, fans, or visitors those who are coming in Olympic city would publish their experience in hostess traditional cultures, foods as
well
as tourist zones, which would likely to have their economic value in higher position even after the
event
.
For example
, one of the Olympic city as Sydney had risen Australian tourism standard and economy after the Olympic
games
than
before
.
On the other hand
,
many
disagree and feel that such
programmes
have
negative
consequences. As their perspective,
government
are spending huge amount for such
sports
event
and, which is incompetent as
well
. Despite this, a
well
organization committee can disburse
money
for certain concerned areas
namely
hostage facilities,
accompanied with
tourist zones, tax for
some
services, proper selection of game field and
so
on.
Therefore
, hosting country can
get
back
money
which they spend.
For instance
, 2016 Rio Olympic
make
Brazil's infrastructure and standard of economy than previous years.
To conclude
, international based
sports
events
are
insisted to put
more
money
on that;
nevertheless
, having a
well
management team can survive such adverse ramifications by respective field volunteers.
However
, as long as worldwide
sports
event
leaders should be wary of this, there are no chance to blame on cost or
money
wastage.