Nowadays, many countries hosting an international sports events like intercountry cricket championship, badminton tournaments and many more. However, organizing intercountry athletic events is more effective for country, while others totally opposing this type of events. Let us consider the arguments for and against these views.
On the positive hand, intercountry athletic events is essential for country’s sport sector, our sports communities could learns lots of things from this types of occasion. For instance, Australia is best in cricket, if our cricket board could organize a tournaments with their team then it would be a great opportunity for our players that they will understand their playing strategies like bowling, fielding and batting. Likewise, by understanding their game, our players can use this strategies and experience during international world cup.
On the other hand, arranging international athletic tournaments could Leeds us the wasting too much money from our national budgets. When we are arranging this types of events then we must spend too much money on special arrangements. For instance, if we arrange a football tournaments between Indian team and Spanish team, at this time we must arrange not only a special seven star hotel and their food but also arrange some reward if they win the tournaments. This could be impossible if we fail to arrange further funding for this events.
To conclude, both these methods have their own benefits. Although organizing international athletics events Leeds our players to learns lots of skills and strategies for their sports, and also we needs further funding from governments for this types of events. If I were to pick one of them, I believe that it is a smart choice to organize intercountry athletic events for our sports community to learn skills related to their sports from foreign players.
Nowadays,
many
countries hosting an
international
sports
events
like
intercountry
cricket championship, badminton
tournaments
and
many
more.
However
, organizing
intercountry
athletic
events
is more effective for country, while others
totally
opposing this
type
of
events
.
Let
us consider the arguments for and against these views.
On the
positive
hand,
intercountry
athletic
events
is essential for country’s
sport
sector, our
sports
communities could
learns
lots of things from
this
types
of occasion.
For instance
, Australia is best in cricket, if our cricket board could organize a
tournaments
with their team then it would be a great opportunity for our
players
that they will understand their playing strategies like bowling, fielding and batting.
Likewise
, by understanding their game, our
players
can
use
this
strategies and experience during
international
world cup.
On the other hand
, arranging
international
athletic
tournaments
could Leeds us the wasting too much money from our national budgets.
When
we are arranging this
types
of
events
then we
must
spend too much money on special arrangements.
For instance
, if we
arrange
a football
tournaments
between Indian team and Spanish team, at this time we
must
arrange
not
only
a special
seven star
hotel
and their food
but
also
arrange
some
reward if they win the
tournaments
. This could be impossible if we fail to
arrange
further
funding for
this
events
.
To conclude
, both these methods have their
own
benefits. Although organizing
international
athletics
events
Leeds our
players
to learns lots of
skills
and strategies for their
sports
, and
also
we
needs
further
funding from
governments
for
this
types
of
events
. If I were to pick one of them, I believe that it is a smart choice to organize
intercountry
athletic
events
for our
sports
community to learn
skills
related to their
sports
from foreign
players
.