Many people believe that every child should be educated until they finished senior high school degrees. Although the first reaction to some people is to concur to such claims. Nonetheless, from my point of views, there are several persuasive reasons to refute this statement. In the following paragraphs, there are a number of perspectives to examine this issue more in depth.
The main reason to support my position is that if young people take education for granted, then they won't appreciate the learning opportunities they have. Take my friend, Tina, for example, her family compelled her for the higher education even though she spent time on playing. She not only learned nothing from the studies, but also met bad friends who taught her how to smoke. On the other hand, my friend Tony, who had a part time job and went for studies at night. He cherished the chance of school life since he paid the tuition himself. From such examples, it demonstrates that children should know why they need to go to the school and they could also have the choices.
Another reason for my belief is that kids may not all enjoy studying. They could be responsible for their own decisions after 16 years old. For instance, my cousin Mike, who went to study in the U. S. A while he was 16 years old. His parents asked him to study until finished university, however, he is a cook now. What he is doing now is nothing related to his studies even though he spent tons of time and money for his schools. Consequently, it can be said that parents should know more about your son or daughter's interests before you force them to spend years on studies.
To conclude, it is not to say that other points of views are totally without merit. Nevertheless, the reasons I have presented could support the position of young people should not always be required to finish full-time studies until 18-year-old.
Many
people
believe that every child should
be educated
until they finished senior high
school
degrees.
Although
the
first
reaction to
some
people
is
to concur to such claims. Nonetheless, from my point of views, there are several persuasive
reasons
to refute this statement. In the following paragraphs, there are a number of perspectives to examine this issue more in depth.
The main
reason
to support my position is that if young
people
take education for granted, then they won't appreciate the learning opportunities they have. Take my friend, Tina,
for example
, her family compelled her for the higher education
even though
she spent time on playing. She not
only
learned nothing from the
studies
,
but
also
met
bad
friends who taught her how to smoke.
On the other hand
, my friend Tony, who had a
part time
job and went for
studies
at night. He cherished the chance of
school
life since he paid the tuition himself. From such examples, it demonstrates that children should know why they need to go to the
school and
they could
also
have the choices.
Another
reason
for my belief is that kids may not all enjoy studying. They could be responsible for their
own
decisions after 16 years
old
.
For instance
, my cousin Mike, who went to
study
in the U. S. A while he was 16 years
old
. His parents asked him to
study
until finished university,
however
, he is a cook
now
. What he is doing
now
is nothing related to his
studies
even though
he spent tons of time and money for his
schools
.
Consequently
, it can
be said
that parents should know more about your son or daughter's interests
before
you force them to spend years on studies.
To conclude
, it is not to say that other points of views are
totally
without merit.
Nevertheless
, the
reasons
I have presented could support the position of young
people
should not always
be required
to finish full-time
studies
until 18-year-
old
.