Many people believe that every child should be educated until they finished senior high school degrees. Although the first reaction to some people is to concur to such claims. Nonetheless, from my point of views, there are several persuasive reasons to refute this statement. In the following paragraphs, there are a number of perspectives to examine this issue more in depth.
The main reason to support my position is that if young people take education for granted, then they won't appreciate the learning opportunities they have. Take my friend, Tina, for example, her family compelled her for the higher education even though she spent time on playing. She not only learned nothing from the studies, but also met bad friends who taught her how to smoke. On the other hand, my friend Tony, who had a part time job and went for studies at night. He cherished the chance of school life since he paid the tuition himself. From such examples, it demonstrates that children should know why they need to go to the school and they could also have the choices.
Another reason for my belief is that kids may not all enjoy studying. They could be responsible for their own decisions after 16 years old. For instance, my cousin Mike, who went to study in the U. S. A while he was 16 years old. His parents asked him to study until finished university, however, he is a cook now. What he is doing now is nothing related to his studies even though he spent tons of time and money for his schools. Consequently, it can be said that parents should know more about your son or daughter's interests before you force them to spend years on studies.
To conclude, it is not to say that other points of views are totally without merit. Nevertheless, the reasons I have presented could support the position of young people should not always be required to finish full-time studies until 18-year-old. 
 Many
  people
 believe that every child should  
be educated
 until they finished senior high  
school
 degrees.  
Although
 the  
first
 reaction to  
some
  people
  is
 to concur to such claims. Nonetheless, from my point of views, there are several persuasive  
reasons
 to refute this statement. In the following paragraphs, there are a number of perspectives to examine this issue more in depth.
The main  
reason
 to support my position is that if young  
people
 take education for granted, then they won't appreciate the learning opportunities they have. Take my friend, Tina,  
for example
, her family compelled her for the higher education  
even though
 she spent time on playing. She not  
only
 learned nothing from the  
studies
,  
but
  also
 met  
bad
 friends who taught her how to smoke.  
On the other hand
, my friend Tony, who had a  
part time
 job and went for  
studies
 at night. He cherished the chance of  
school
 life since he paid the tuition himself. From such examples, it demonstrates that children should know why they need to go to the  
school and
 they could  
also
 have the choices.
Another  
reason
 for my belief is that kids may not all enjoy studying. They could be responsible for their  
own
 decisions after 16 years  
old
.  
For instance
, my cousin Mike, who went to  
study
 in the U. S. A while he was 16 years  
old
. His parents asked him to  
study
 until finished university,  
however
, he is a cook  
now
. What he is doing  
now
 is nothing related to his  
studies
  even though
 he spent tons of time and money for his  
schools
.  
Consequently
, it can  
be said
 that parents should know more about your son or daughter's interests  
before
 you force them to spend years on studies. 
To conclude
, it is not to say that other points of views are  
totally
 without merit.  
Nevertheless
, the  
reasons
 I have presented could support the position of young  
people
 should not always  
be required
 to finish full-time  
studies
 until 18-year- 
old
.