Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people think that wild animals should not be kept in zoos. Others believe that there are good reasons for having zoos

Some people think that wild animals should not be kept in zoos. Others believe that there are good reasons for having zoos epw7

Since the dawn of time, wild animals are kept in zoos all over the world. This is a controversial issue. At present, zoos are a tourist attraction in many countries and need wild animals to attract visitors. I believe that they should not be kept in zoos and there should be alternative places to see them. This essay will discuss both sides and an opinion will be put forth. There are many good reasons to not build zoos in our cities. First of all, god’s precious gifts need to live in their natural habitat. Furthermore, zoos are no place for wild things. If animals need to be cared for, they should be looked after in their natural habitat in game parks or wildlife reserves. Governments should look after the precious wild animals in their country and should close down zoos that profit for them. Another valid reason to support this view is that people can see wild animals on the internet, or in books. They don’t need to visit them in cages where they are sick or dying. Moreover, these zoos try to make money from animals' misery and they don’t care about the animals' welfare. Recent research in Harvard shows that 89% of all wild animals die in cages. In addition to this, we should allow animals to live in the wild. They can be healthy in their own habitat, they can hunt and have normal behavior. They cannot do this in a zoo. In the future, if a man wants to see wild animals, we must travel to their country and see them in the wild in their environment and not ours. In a nutshell, people believe that zoos are good places to keep wild animals, I feel that we do not need zoos anymore. We can look at wild animals on the internet or travel there and we can be happy for these wild creatures.

Since the dawn of time, wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 are This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :retained
kept
 in zoos all over the world. This is a controversial issue. At present, zoos are a tourist attraction in This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 countries and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withuserightwishcommitmentdemandobligation
need
 wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 to attract visitors. I believe that they should not be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :retained
kept
 in zoos and there should be alternative places to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witness
see
 them. This essay will discuss both sides and an opinion will be put
 forth.

There are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 reasons to not build zoos in our cities. This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".First
First of all
, god’s precious gifts You use this word too often, consider replacing it withuserightwishcommitmentdemandobligation
need
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
 in their natural habitat. Furthermore
, zoos are no place for wild things. If You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withuserightwishcommitmentdemandobligation
need
 to be cared
 for, they should be looked
 after in their natural habitat in game parks or wildlife reserves. This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
Governments
 should look after the precious wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 in their country and should close down zoos that profit for them. Another valid reason to support this view is that This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witness
see
 wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 on the internet, or in books. They don’t You use this word too often, consider replacing it withuserightwishcommitmentdemandobligation
need
 to visit them in cages where they are sick or dying. Moreover
, these zoos try to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 money from animals' Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).misery, and
misery and
 they don’t care about the animals' welfare. Recent research in Harvard This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratesportraysindicatesdisplays
shows
 that 89% of all wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :pass away
die
 in cages.

In addition
 to this, we should This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :authorize
allow
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
 in the wild. They can be healthy in their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
 habitat, they can hunt and have normal behavior. They cannot do this in a zoo. In the future, if a This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualresidentcitizen
man
 wants to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witness
see
 wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
, we This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
 travel to their country and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witness
see
 them in the wild in their environment and not ours.

In a nutshell, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 believe that zoos are This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 places to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :retain
keep
 wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
, I feel that we do not You use this word too often, consider replacing it withuserightwishcommitmentdemandobligation
need
 zoos anymore. We can look at wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 on the internet or travel Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).there, and
there and
 we can be happy for these wild creatures. 