Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both views and state your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

: Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both views and state your opinion 8qqV
Several individuals believe that enrolling employers to industries need to train people who are inventive and self-employed whereas others are of the view that they need to train people who work in a group and obey the introductions. In my opinion, I think they need to be inventive and self-employed to go through the latest ideas and gain a vast amount of money for the industry. To begin with, employers who work inventively and independently became success in their industry all over the period. The move over always industries need innovative thinkers who think out of the box rather than working traditionally according to the rules and regulations. Also, they are self-sufficient, they don’t require any guidance or assistance, and it assists them to prove their performance skills better than others. Furthermore, a fairly example is Google, Yahoo, and Amazon. These companies offer more innovative thinkers to the company and a proof that their income level will grow will also grow up to 25% in 2020. On the other hand, other individuals consider those hiring employers who can work with a group and follow commands the best way to develop the industry. I disagree with the opinion since it causes to limit the thinking criteria. It also causes employers to become lazy and beginning to miss the duty constantly. Because when working in a group, you can easily abduction the work and load all the works for a single person to do. In addition to this, it results in creating small issues in the company as high level set number of work pressure on several employers. Doing repetitive work over and over again grabs the interest in the field and leads to quit or retire from a position. Apart from this pretty example, researches had found working in a team and following the introductions reduce the income level of industries according to the 2014 business report. In conclusion, individuals who play the role innovatively and independently had the chance to enhance their career rather than those who work in a circular condition. More and more innovative individuals assist to grow the nation to the next level.
Several
individuals
believe that enrolling
employers
to
industries
need
to train
people
who
are inventive and self-employed whereas others are of the view that they
need
to train
people
who
work
in a group and obey the introductions. In my opinion, I
think
they
need
to be inventive and self-employed to go through the latest
ideas
and gain a vast amount of money for the industry.

To
begin
with,
employers
who
work
inventively
and
independently
became success in their
industry
all
over
the period. The
move
over
always
industries
need
innovative thinkers
who
think
out of the box
rather
than working
traditionally
according to the
rules
and regulations.
Also
, they are self-sufficient, they don’t require any guidance or assistance, and it assists them to prove their performance
skills
better than others.
Furthermore
, a
fairly example
is Google, Yahoo, and Amazon. These
companies
offer more innovative thinkers to the
company
and a proof that their income
level
will grow will
also
grow up to 25% in 2020.

On the
other
hand,
other
individuals
consider those hiring
employers
who
can
work
with a group and follow commands the best way to develop the
industry
. I disagree with the opinion since it causes to limit the thinking criteria. It
also
causes
employers
to become lazy and beginning to miss the duty
constantly
.
Because
when working in a group, you can
easily
abduction the
work
and load all the works for a single person to do.
In addition
to this, it results in creating
small
issues in the
company
as high
level
set number of
work
pressure on several
employers
. Doing repetitive
work
over
and
over
again grabs the interest in the field and leads to quit or retire from a position. Apart from this pretty example, researches had found working in a team and following the introductions
reduce
the income
level
of
industries
according to the 2014 business report.

In conclusion
,
individuals
who
play the role
innovatively
and
independently
had the chance to enhance their career
rather
than those
who
work
in a circular condition. More and more innovative
individuals
assist to grow the nation to the
next
level
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad
Show Comments
If you talk to a man in a language he understands, that goes to his head. If you talk to him in his own language, that goes to his heart.
Nelson Mandela

IELTS essay : Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both views and state your opinion

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
356 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts