Due to the sharp increase in cross-country social, economic, and political interactions in recent decades and vast opportunities for communication and cultural and scientific exchange provided by technological advances the humanity might seem to become united and, what is more, unified. Nonetheless, many researchers ring the alarm bells about the dangers of refractory globalization processes and integration and emphasize the superficial nature of the phenomenon. I find the above-stated point of view the most reasonable due to several arguments that I am going to present and discuss in this essay.
Firstly, as Pico Iyer once noticed in his article in Time Magazine in 2000, the less there are conflicts across borders, the more wars take place inside of them. Indeed, multinational corporations and overall aspiration for similarity in terms of equal opportunities and access to the same products, services, and activities might make one feel valued and give a sense of belonging. However, throughout its incredibly long history, mankind has accumulated a rich background, especially in terms of religion, language, and mindsets. This circumstance makes it almost impossible to achieve a complete convention among all the people on earth, so that no one feels neglected and left behind. Obviously, without this convention, there is no complete integration possible.
Besides, companies and corporations are only able to become multinational in case they have enough resources for that. Moreover, the world market cannot provide a platform for every business existing. Therefore, due to this contradiction, the world becomes occupied by the companies like McDonald’s and H&M, i. e. those which already are pretty successful and mostly come from prosperous states in the first place, leaving no chance for the so-called Third World countries to ever reach higher levels.
In conclusion, even though globalization seems to be making the world a better place and reducing tension and disputes between countries and nations, this effect might only be visionary. The deeper processes are likely to result in uncountable wars inside the borders and endless confrontation between the worldwide trends and divergent concepts. At the end of the day, humanity is bound to come apart.
Due to the sharp increase in cross-country social, economic, and political interactions in recent decades and vast opportunities for communication and cultural and scientific exchange provided by technological advances the humanity might seem to become united and,
what is more
, unified. Nonetheless,
many
researchers ring the alarm bells about the
dangers
of refractory globalization processes and integration and emphasize the superficial nature of the phenomenon. I find the above-stated point of view the most reasonable due to several arguments that I am going to present and discuss in this essay.
Firstly
, as
Pico
Iyer
once noticed in his article in Time Magazine in 2000, the less there are conflicts across borders, the more wars take place
inside of
them.
Indeed
, multinational corporations and
overall
aspiration for similarity in terms of equal opportunities and access to the same products, services, and activities might
make
one feel valued and give a sense of belonging.
However
, throughout its
incredibly
long history, mankind has accumulated a rich background,
especially
in terms of religion, language, and mindsets. This circumstance
makes
it almost impossible to achieve a complete convention among all the
people
on earth,
so
that no one feels neglected and
left
behind.
Obviously
, without this convention, there is no complete integration possible.
Besides
,
companies
and corporations are
only
able to become multinational in case they have
enough
resources for that.
Moreover
, the
world
market cannot provide a platform for every business existing.
Therefore
, due to this contradiction, the
world
becomes occupied by the
companies
like McDonald’s and H&M,
i. e.
those which already are pretty successful and
mostly
come
from prosperous states in the
first
place, leaving no chance for the
so
-called Third
World
countries to ever reach higher levels.
In conclusion
,
even though
globalization seems to be making the
world
a better place and reducing tension and disputes between countries and nations, this effect might
only
be visionary. The deeper processes are likely to result in uncountable wars inside the borders and endless confrontation between the worldwide trends and divergent concepts. At the
end
of the day, humanity
is bound
to
come
apart.
Funny
Love
Wow
Angry
Sad