At a time in which environmental problems are our top priority, the majority of people opine that blighting to animals and various plants is the most critical problem in our modernizing era. However others say differently: there are a multitude of vital problems besides damaging plants and animals. In this essay, I will give both arguments of the supporters and try to draw a conclusion.
On the one hand, when the world is lost its animals and plants, the number of visitors to zoos and admirers of the plants may abruptly decrease. Since, those kinds of places are one of the main income stream for mysterious countries. To illustrate, approximately 85%of people spend their leisure for going zoos, it seems that safe the beasts may play a big role for the authority and humans' daily life. Additionally, disappearance of plants will be a considerable reason for another aftermath. To be more precise, if plants are not germinated around the earth, drought will appear and after that every country's economy will face vast deprivation.
On the other hand, proponents say that other important problems might be found besides loss the animals and vegetables. That is to say, air pollution will come as the most dangerous risk to us. Because, person could not without oxygen more than 15seconds, likewise, whether man inhales harmful air, that person may make worse disease and it will negative influence for its future career. Secondly-and very importanly- people who lives near the forest or ocean may hurt from climate change. Out of this, people have fearing during their life.
The main conclusion to be drawn is that, though, many people think losing the amount of animals and plants is the strongest environmental problem. Nonetheless, for my part, different climate change and air pollution are shown as the most important problems in our modernizing era.
At a time in which environmental
problems
are our top priority, the majority of
people
opine that blighting to
animals
and various
plants
is the most critical
problem
in our modernizing era.
However
others say
differently
: there are a multitude of vital
problems
besides
damaging
plants
and
animals
. In this essay, I will give both arguments of the supporters and try to draw a conclusion.
On the one hand, when the world
is lost
its
animals
and
plants
, the number of visitors to zoos and admirers of the
plants
may
abruptly
decrease. Since, those kinds of places are one of the main income stream for mysterious countries. To illustrate, approximately 85%of
people
spend their leisure for going zoos, it seems that safe the beasts may play a
big
role for the authority and humans' daily life.
Additionally
, disappearance of
plants
will be a considerable reason for another aftermath. To be more precise, if
plants
are not germinated around the earth, drought will appear and after that every country's economy will face vast deprivation.
On the other hand
, proponents say that other
important
problems
might
be found
besides
loss the
animals
and vegetables.
That is
to say, air pollution will
come
as the most
dangerous
risk
to us.
Because
, person could not without oxygen more than 15seconds,
likewise
, whether
man
inhales harmful air, that person may
make
worse
disease and
it will
negative
influence for its future career.
Secondly
-and
very
importanly
-
people
who
lives
near the forest or ocean may hurt from climate
change
. Out of this,
people
have fearing during their life.
The main conclusion to
be drawn
is that, though,
many
people
think
losing the amount of
animals
and
plants
is the strongest environmental
problem
. Nonetheless, for my part,
different
climate
change
and air pollution
are shown
as the most
important
problems
in our modernizing era.