A number of people would argue that the cost of goods should be considered while others including me believe that the quality is foremost due to the fact of the environmental protection.
On the one hand, not paying attention to the cost of goods is, indeed, ignoring the part of the community. This is because low-income people may not be able to afford expensive items. In other words, those who advocate this notion, believe that putting a price on products should be done in a way that is affordable for all members of society. In the fashion industry, as an example, this idea has been supported by some brands such as Zara. Their focus is on the production of clothing and textiles that are designed similar to costly ones but at a reasonable price, for those who do not incur the expense of overpriced ones. As a result, low earning people would not concern about their living costs, and their quality of life seems to increase because of eliminating these worries.
On the other hand, others hold the opinion that the quality of products is more essential assert that if it has been overlooked, more waste will be generated and this a threat for the environment. Because poor quality commodities spoil faster and they should be replaced by new ones and it means the huge unwanted wares transfer to rubbish. Return to the example mentioned in the previous paragraph, clothing Industry. Unfortunately, a major reason those clothes are so cheap is because of a decrease in the quality of materials and manufacturing. Most of them are made from synthetic fibers, which do not break down naturally. This can create problems as water cannot flow into the soil, and chemicals from the fabrics release poisons into the surrounding air and water. Consequently, I think, if we do not strive to produce well-made and durable products, environmental catastrophe will occur.
To conclude, manufacturing the goods with sustainable material that causes the least damage to the environment should be the ultimate goal of governments.
A number of
people
would argue that the cost of
goods
should
be considered
while others including me believe that the
quality
is foremost due to the fact of the environmental protection.
On the one hand, not paying attention to the cost of
goods
is,
indeed
, ignoring the part of the community. This is
because
low-income
people
may not be able to afford expensive items. In
other
words, those who advocate this notion, believe that putting a price on products should
be done
in a way
that is
affordable for all members of society. In the fashion industry, as an example, this
idea
has
been supported
by
some
brands such as Zara. Their focus is on the production of clothing and textiles that
are designed
similar to costly
ones
but
at a reasonable price, for those who do not incur the expense of overpriced
ones
.
As a result
, low earning
people
would not concern about their living costs, and their
quality
of life seems to increase
because
of eliminating these worries.
On the
other
hand, others hold the opinion that the
quality
of products is more essential assert that if it has
been overlooked
, more waste will
be generated
and
this
a threat for the environment.
Because
poor
quality
commodities spoil
faster and
they should
be replaced
by new
ones and
it means the huge unwanted wares transfer to rubbish. Return to the example mentioned in the previous paragraph, clothing Industry. Unfortunately, a major reason those clothes are
so
cheap
is
because
of a decrease in the
quality
of materials and manufacturing. Most of them
are made
from synthetic fibers, which do not break down
naturally
. This can create problems as water cannot flow into the soil, and chemicals from the fabrics release poisons into the surrounding air and water.
Consequently
, I
think
, if we do not strive to produce well-made and durable products, environmental catastrophe will occur.
To conclude
, manufacturing the
goods
with sustainable material that causes the least damage to the environment should be the ultimate goal of
governments
.
Funny
Love
Wow
Angry
Sad