some people opine that private health sectors are more beneficial in terms of providing health services; however, others argue that maintenance of citizens health should be free of charge and regulated by government. In my opinion, even though private sectors have better mediacl infrastructure, higher authorities ought to run health care without charging any fees from people. On the one hand, private health care provides better amenities to patients as compared to government authorised hospitals. To be more specific, private hospitals tend to have advanced medical equipments such as x-ray radiation therapy machines for the cure of cancer, which generally are not available in public hospitals. For instance, In India, most of times individuals have to go private clinics owing to unavaliblty of necessary medical machines at public hospitals. Thus, with their facilities private health centre may cater the health of people in better way. Nevertheless, free medical services run by government can ameliorate life expectancy and economic productivity. In other words, since inflation and increasing number of maladies, a number of people are unable to afford the cost of treatment for various diseases which sometimes become the cause of their death. if they have free medical access, they can easily get their treatment done. consequently, this will not only raise life duration but also unable citizens to focus more on their work and be healthier, allowing them to contribute more to economy. therefore, the more free health care, the more long lives and boost economy will be. In conclusion, although private health sectors are likely to offer highly advanced treatments, i believe that government occupies medical centers with free of cost medical facility may boost countries economy and lives of people.
some
people
opine that
private
health
sectors are more beneficial in terms of providing
health
services;
however
, others argue that maintenance of citizens
health
should be
free
of charge and regulated by
government
. In my opinion,
even though
private
sectors have better
mediacl
infrastructure, higher authorities ought to run
health
care without charging any fees from
people
. On the one hand,
private
health
care provides better amenities to patients as compared to
government
authorised
hospitals
. To be more specific,
private
hospitals
tend to have advanced
medical
equipments such as x-ray radiation therapy machines for the cure of cancer, which
generally
are not available in public
hospitals
.
For instance
, In India, most of times individuals
have to
go
private
clinics owing to
unavaliblty
of necessary
medical
machines at public
hospitals
.
Thus
, with their facilities
private
health
centre
may cater the
health
of
people
in better way.
Nevertheless
,
free
medical
services run by
government
can ameliorate life expectancy and economic productivity.
In other words
, since inflation and increasing number of maladies, a number of
people
are unable to afford the cost of treatment for various diseases which
sometimes
become the cause of their death.
if
they have
free
medical
access, they can
easily
get
their treatment done.
consequently
, this will not
only
raise life duration
but
also
unable citizens to focus more on their work and be healthier, allowing them to contribute more to economy.
therefore
, the more
free
health
care, the more long
lives
and boost economy will be.
In conclusion
, although
private
health
sectors are likely to offer
highly
advanced treatments,
i
believe that
government
occupies
medical
centers with
free
of cost
medical
facility may boost countries economy and
lives
of
people
.