Recruiting new employees can be a long and painful process. Some employers conduct interviews to select new workers. I disagree with the given statement, which says that interview is not a reliable method, and other methods are better. I believe that interview. is a reliable method, but there are many other methods which are equaly good, and the choice is on the recruiters as to which method they find suitable for their need.
There are many reasons why interview is preferred by some employers for hiring new employees. Firstly, by the interview the recruiters can get an idea about the personality and social skills of the potential employees. In interviews, there is face-to-face interaction and the candidates have to answer impromptu questions, from which personality traits can be judged. Also, by asking some case study type questions, employees can judge traits like ability to handle pressure, confidence and ability to think outside the box.
However, there are many other selection methods with varied advantages. One of other common methods is written test. This method is preferred when the focus in on judging the theoretical knowledge of the person. Another conventional selection basis is group discussion. This method is good where a major job requirement of the company is conversational skills for instance sales jobs. Group discussion can determine the convincing power of an individual. Last but not the least, there can be combination of the all the three methods like written tests, followed by group discussion and finally interviews. This method is the most thorough of all the methods checking everything from personality traits to knowledge and also communication ability.
It is evident that different methods have different advantages and the best method cannot be singled out. It depends upon the situation. For example, interviews assess a person's individual traits better whereas written tests are more about knowledge and expertise in an area. There are shortcomings of every method too for example there is a chance of personal bias in interviews. The combination of methods can take too long to select a candidate and may be too expensive to conduct for small companies. To conclude, hiring method depends upon the job and company requirement. In some situations, conducting interviews is more apt, whereas in some situations the other methods may be more advantageous.
Recruiting new
employees
can be a long and painful process.
Some
employers conduct
interviews
to select new workers. I disagree with the
given
statement, which says that
interview
is not a reliable
method
, and
other
methods
are better. I believe that
interview
.
is
a reliable
method
,
but
there are
many
other
methods
which are
equaly
good
, and the choice is on the recruiters as to which
method
they find suitable for their need.
There are
many
reasons why
interview
is preferred
by
some
employers for hiring new
employees
.
Firstly
, by the
interview
the recruiters can
get
an
idea
about the personality and social
skills
of the potential
employees
. In
interviews
, there is face-to-face interaction and the candidates
have to
answer impromptu questions, from which personality
traits
can
be judged
.
Also
, by asking
some
case study type questions,
employees
can judge
traits
like ability to handle pressure, confidence and ability to
think
outside the box.
However
, there are
many
other
selection
methods
with varied advantages. One of
other
common
methods
is written
test
. This
method
is preferred
when the focus in on judging the theoretical knowledge of the person. Another conventional selection basis is group discussion. This
method
is
good
where a major job requirement of the
company
is conversational
skills
for instance
sales jobs. Group discussion can determine the convincing power of an individual. Last
but
not the least, there can be combination of the all the three
methods
like written
tests
, followed by group discussion and
finally
interviews
. This
method
is the most thorough of all the
methods
checking everything from personality
traits
to knowledge and
also
communication ability.
It is evident that
different
methods
have
different
advantages and the best
method
cannot
be singled
out. It depends upon the situation.
For example
,
interviews
assess a person's individual
traits
better whereas written
tests
are more about knowledge and expertise in an area. There are shortcomings of every
method
too
for example
there is a chance of personal bias in
interviews
. The combination of
methods
can take too long to select a candidate and may be too expensive to conduct for
small
companies
.
To conclude
, hiring
method
depends upon the job and
company
requirement. In
some
situations, conducting
interviews
is more apt, whereas in
some
situations the
other
methods
may be more advantageous.