Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Modern technology has greatly changed how we work and is of benefit to all societies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Modern technology has greatly changed how we work and is of benefit to all societies. jRg0d

In recent years, it is undeniable that breakthroughs in technology have significantly transformed working practices. However, my opinions are not in line with the assumption that all countries would reap benefits from these innovations. Admittedly, innovations in technology have resulted in novel approaches to work. Standing out from all other inventions is the emergence of artificial intelligence which has liberated humans from both mundane and dangerous tasks. For example, autonomous cars adopting this new technology has spared passengers time for more productive activities such as checking emails and studying instead of concentrating on driving. In addition, jobs involving exposure to toxins or risking life have now mostly been performed by automated machines, which significantly reduces the chance of death among human workers due to work-specific natures. Moreover, the advent of cutting-edge technology has laid a foundation on which work productivity is greatly boosted, which would in turn facilitate even more innovations to engender. Nevertheless, some countries cannot even gain access to state-of-the-art developments happening around the world, especially poverty-stricken areas which are well far left behind. In these places, people have greater and more urgent needs to meet such as sustenance or housing. This fact suggests that the idea of innovations would meet with insurmountable difficulties. To make the case even worse, in poor countries the governments seem to succumb to corruption, bribery and clan-based thinking, which not only drains resources but also stagnates economic growth. Without these catalysts, it is highly unlikely for a country to sprint in the technological race. In conclusion, drastic changes in technology go in tandem with progressions in the way humans work, making it safer and more productive. However, not all nations could yield benefits from such advancement due to political reasons.

In recent years, it is undeniable that breakthroughs in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmachineryautomation
technology
 have significantly
 transformed working practices. However
, my opinions are not in line with the assumption that all You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 would reap benefits from these innovations.

Admittedly
, innovations in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmachineryautomation
technology
 have resulted in novel approaches to work. Standing out from all other inventions is the emergence of artificial intelligence which has liberated humans from both mundane and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hazardousrisky
dangerous
 tasks. For example
, autonomous cars adopting this new You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmachineryautomation
technology
 has spared passengers time for more productive activities such as checking emails and studying instead
 of concentrating on driving. In addition
, jobs involving exposure to toxins or risking life have This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :nowadays
now
mostly
been performed
 by automated machines, which significantly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviates
reduces
 the chance of death among human workers due to work-specific natures. Moreover
, the advent of cutting-edge You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmachineryautomation
technology
 has laid a foundation on which work productivity is greatly
 boosted, which would in turn facilitate even more innovations to engender.

Nevertheless
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 cannot even gain access to state-of-the-art developments happening around the world, especially
 poverty-stricken areas which are well far This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :departed
left
 behind. In these places, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 have greater and more urgent needs to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :attain
meet
 such as sustenance or housing. This fact suggests that the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
 of innovations would This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :attain
meet
 with insurmountable difficulties. To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 the case even worse, in poor You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
governments
 seem to succumb to corruption, bribery and clan-based thinking, which not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 drains resources This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
 stagnates economic growth. Without these catalysts, it is highly
 unlikely for a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrusticbucolichomeyagrarianprovincial
country
 to sprint in the technological race.

In conclusion
, drastic This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :altersadjusts
changes
 in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmachineryautomation
technology
 go in tandem with progressions in the way humans work, making it safer and more productive. However
, not all nations could yield benefits from such advancement due to political reasons. 