Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. mmQr
Holding an international sport olympic could give many benefits to its country. However, some people believe it would give several negative impacts to the country itself. In my opinion, the country host would have more benefits rather than negative effects.
Firstly, the positive impact of country who hosting an globally sport event is to increase tourism and travel. Due to athlete and their crew who will come to compete to the country host, therefore, many travel industry's profit will increase because of the services that foreign athlete will use. Moreover, being a country moderator of olympic event will make country more famous and being known by the majority of countries in the world. Similarly, will increase politic and social activities with other countries in the future.
On the other hand, there are serveral negative effects for the country itself, in other words, the country will have to expense huge amount of money, on account of being the country host. That is to say, the country host will need to renovate stadiums, gymnasium and other sport places, as well as recruiting more people to manage the event. Furthermore, there will be a serious problem in traffict congestion, especially in match hours, because of athletes, audiences, also crews will go to sports places, therefore, the roads will be crowded, consequently, the locals will be hard to transport.
In conclusion, although there is many benefits from being a country host of sports competition, such as increasing tourism industry and the popularity of the country. Nevertheless, there also some disadvantages to the country, that is, plenty of expenses and traffic jams on match hours. I think, country should try to be the host of world sports event, because regadless of the drawback, there are many advantages for the being the country host of international olympics.
Holding an international
sport
olympic
could give
many
benefits to its
country
.
However
,
some
people
believe it would give several
negative
impacts to the
country
itself. In my opinion, the
country
host
would have more benefits
rather
than
negative
effects.
Firstly
, the
positive
impact of
country
who hosting
an
globally
sport
event
is to increase tourism and travel. Due to athlete and their crew who will
come
to compete to the
country
host
,
therefore
,
many travel
industry's profit will increase
because
of the services that foreign athlete will
use
.
Moreover
, being a
country
moderator of
olympic
event
will
make
country
more
famous
and
being known
by the majority of
countries
in the world.
Similarly
, will increase politic and social activities with
other
countries
in the future.
On the
other
hand, there are
serveral
negative
effects for the
country
itself, in
other
words, the
country
will
have to
expense huge amount of money, on account of being the
country
host
.
That is
to say, the
country
host
will need to renovate stadiums, gymnasium and
other
sport
places,
as well
as recruiting more
people
to manage the
event
.
Furthermore
, there will be a serious problem in
traffict
congestion,
especially
in match hours,
because
of athletes, audiences,
also
crews will go to
sports
places,
therefore
, the roads will
be crowded
,
consequently
, the locals will be
hard
to transport.
In conclusion
, although there is
many
benefits from being a
country
host
of
sports
competition, such as increasing tourism industry and the popularity of the
country
.
Nevertheless
, there
also
some
disadvantages to the
country
,
that is
,
plenty
of expenses and traffic jams on match hours. I
think
,
country
should try to be the
host
of world
sports
event
,
because
regadless
of the drawback, there are
many
advantages for
the
being the
country
host
of international
olympics
.