People have different views about the funding of creative artists. While some people disagree with the idea of government support for artists, I believe that money for art projects should come from both governments and other sources.
Some art projects definitely require help from the state. In the UK, there are many works of art in public spaces, such as streets or squares in city centres. In Liverpool, for example, there are several new statues and sculptures in the docks area of the city, which has been redeveloped recently. These artworks represent culture, heritage and history. They serve to educate people about the city, and act as landmarks or talking points for visitors and tourists. Governments and local councils should pay creative artists to produce this kind of art, because without their funding our cities would be much less interesting and attractive.
On the other hand, I can understand the arguments against government funding for art. The main reason for this view is that governments have more important concerns. For example, state budgets need to be spent on education, healthcare, infrastructure and security, among other areas. These public services are vital for a country to function properly, whereas the work of creative artists, even in public places, is a luxury. Another reason for this opinion is that artists do a job like any other professional, and they should therefore earn their own money by selling their work.
In conclusion, there are good reasons why artists should rely on alternative sources of financial support, but in my opinion government help is sometimes necessary.
People
have
different
views about the funding of creative
artists
. While
some
people
disagree with the
idea
of
government
support for
artists
, I believe that money for
art
projects should
come
from both
governments
and
other
sources.
Some
art
projects definitely require
help
from the state. In the UK, there are
many
works of
art
in public spaces, such as streets or squares in city
centres
. In Liverpool,
for example
, there are several new statues and sculptures in the
docks
area of the city, which has
been redeveloped
recently. These artworks represent culture, heritage and history. They serve to educate
people
about the city, and act as landmarks or talking points for visitors and tourists.
Governments
and local councils should pay creative
artists
to produce this kind of
art
,
because
without their funding our
cities
would be much less interesting and attractive.
On the
other
hand, I can understand the arguments against
government
funding for
art
. The main reason for this view is that
governments
have more
important
concerns.
For example
, state budgets need to
be spent
on education, healthcare, infrastructure and security, among
other
areas. These public services are vital for a country to function
properly
, whereas the work of creative
artists
, even in public places, is a luxury. Another reason for this opinion is that
artists
do a job like any
other
professional, and they should
therefore
earn their
own
money by selling their work.
In conclusion
, there are
good
reasons why
artists
should rely on alternative sources of financial support,
but
in my opinion
government
help
is
sometimes
necessary.