Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. VDRJ
People have different views on whether creative artists such as painters and musicians should be funded by governments. Some believe that it is important for the government to support these artists financially, while other think that they should receive financial support from other sources. I agree with the former and will discuss both views in the essay.
The opponents of funding creative artists through governments argue that there are a variety of funding sources such as companies, local communities, organizations and online music and video streaming, which can provide better funding opportunities to the artists. For example, musicians could earn lots of money by streaming their music online, holding live concerts and selling their songs through entertainment companies. It is true that there are many popular singers who have millions of fans and earn lots of money. In contract, in many countries, scientists are not as popular as musicians and their salaries are also much less than these supper stars. In addition, the money saved by the government can be invested in more vital sectors such as science and technology, and public services such as health and education systems.
On the other hand, there are many reasons to support governments’ financial support on creative artists. It is undeniable that art is an important part of our societies. Creative art makes our lives enjoyable, cheerful and colourful. Unfortunately, in many places, art, especially creative art is often under-funded. Although a few of the famous ones may be very rich, many of the musicians and painters are not earning enough to meet their needs and have to work multiple jobs. Lacking financial support from governments means that less and less people will choose artists as their careers. As a result, less beautiful artworks and songs will not be created for us to enjoy. Although alternative sources could be an option, they are usually profit driven, and therefore, are more willing to invest in profitable arts, but not so much on some other types of art, such as traditional music.
In conclude, I think it is important for the government to fund creative artists due to the importance of art to our lives and the fact that most of these professionals are under-funded.
People
have
different
views on whether
creative
artists
such as painters and
musicians
should
be funded
by
governments
.
Some
believe that it is
important
for the
government
to
support
these
artists
financially
, while
other
think
that they should receive financial
support
from
other
sources. I
agree
with the former and will discuss both views in the essay.
The opponents of funding
creative
artists
through
governments
argue that there are a variety of funding sources such as
companies
, local communities, organizations and online music and video streaming, which can provide better funding opportunities to the
artists
.
For example
,
musicians
could earn lots of money by streaming their music online, holding
live
concerts and selling their songs through entertainment
companies
. It is true that there are
many
popular singers who have millions of fans and earn lots of money. In contract, in
many
countries, scientists are not as popular as
musicians
and their salaries are
also
much
less
than these supper stars.
In addition
, the money saved by the
government
can
be invested
in more vital sectors such as science and technology, and public services such as health and education systems.
On the
other
hand, there are
many
reasons to
support
governments’
financial
support
on
creative
artists
. It is undeniable that
art
is an
important
part of our societies.
Creative
art
makes
our
lives
enjoyable, cheerful and
colourful
. Unfortunately, in
many
places,
art
,
especially
creative
art
is
often
under-funded. Although a few of the
famous
ones may be
very
rich,
many
of the
musicians
and painters are not earning
enough
to
meet
their needs and
have to
work multiple jobs. Lacking financial
support
from
governments
means that
less
and
less
people
will choose
artists
as their careers.
As a result
,
less
beautiful
artworks and songs will not
be created
for us to enjoy. Although alternative sources could be an option, they are
usually
profit driven, and
therefore
, are more willing to invest in profitable
arts
,
but
not
so
much on
some
other
types of
art
, such as traditional music.
In conclude, I
think
it is
important
for the
government
to fund
creative
artists
due to the importance of
art
to our
lives
and the fact that most of these professionals are under-funded.