It is obvious that progress of industry is alternative method to build up wealth. However, most of people oppose this concern and they think economic movements are banned to assist in improving quality of surroundings. In my opinion, this notion is partly true and following essay will explain with worthwhile details. On the one hand, economic advancement is the good solution to stop poverty. In order to eradicate poverty government need to create more jobs by building plants to produce and supply unemployed people with work. This factories will profit both country and society 's budget. Therefore, this is a key decision to resolve in order to diminish impoverishment. Furthermore, countries which are limited resources need to increase their development to stay away for poverty. On the other hand, there are countless examples to support the opposing views that economic growth results in environmental destruction. Another critical reason to protect the environment is the lack of any substantial evidence to prove that economic growth eradicated poverty. Moreover, wild life are being destroyed nowadays since government more consentrate their attention an economic development or industrialise. As a result of this habitat of creature is ruined. Indeed, there are many countries in history which caused huge damage to the earth. I think governments can develop the economy and protect the environment simultaneously. They should know to avoid a risk of damage by using technology. The main reason I suggest is that most of people may lose their jobs and high unemployed rate may cause another social problems. In conclusion, terminating economic development can not be available way. Instead of this, government should pay attention to both sides of this phenomenon
It is obvious that progress of industry is alternative method to build up wealth.
However
, most of
people
oppose this
concern and
they
think
economic
movements
are banned
to assist in improving quality of surroundings. In my opinion, this notion is partly true and following essay will
explain
with worthwhile
details
. On the one hand,
economic
advancement is the
good
solution to
stop
poverty
. In order to eradicate
poverty
government
need to create more jobs by building plants to produce and supply unemployed
people
with work.
This
factories will profit both country and society 's budget.
Therefore
, this is a key decision to resolve in order to diminish impoverishment.
Furthermore
, countries which
are limited
resources need to increase their development to stay away for
poverty
.
On the other hand
, there are countless examples to support the opposing views that
economic
growth results in environmental destruction. Another critical reason to protect the environment is the lack of any substantial evidence to prove that
economic
growth eradicated
poverty
.
Moreover
, wild life are being
destroyed
nowadays since
government
more
consentrate
their attention an
economic
development or
industrialise
.
As
a result of this habitat of creature
is ruined
.
Indeed
, there are
many
countries in history which caused huge damage to the earth. I
think
governments
can develop the economy and protect the environment
simultaneously
. They should know to avoid a
risk
of damage by using technology. The main reason I suggest is that most of
people
may lose their jobs and high unemployed rate may cause another social problems.
In conclusion
, terminating
economic
development can not be
available
way.
Instead
of this,
government
should pay attention to both sides of this
phenomenon