While some individual believe that in every educational institution students be allowed to choose subject whatever they want to study, others, think that they should only be permitted to study science and technology subject that will develop their future. There are arguments on both sides of this very topical debate, and I will discuss them now.
On the one hand, opponents of the alternative subjects at university assume that students in such conditions would not be mature. This means, if they only educated in particular subjects, it might be problem with their daily life in the future. For example, they could not help to their children with homework, because of they did not gain a knowledge from random subject. However, students who studied subject which related to science and technology will be common people for society, as they have a knowledge about many sphere. Finally, they able to do many activities which might be useful for country development.
On the other hand, people who against to the compulsory education say that students who are taught with many themes often not well educated and in the future it might be troubles with job finding. Because studying in all subjects is mentally hard and consequently student could not be ready with his chosen profession after graduation. While students who choose particular subjects usually will be very good at their sphere and they are sought by employers every time. Finally, doing a job in which you are the best is essential side in this globalization.
In conclusion, my own opinion is that students who are provided with wide range of choices in their schooling is the best technique of education, since it is really helpful for country development. Of course, this is provided if they are managed carefully and it requires huge amount of specialist to balance all spheres.
While
some
individual
believe that in every educational institution
students
be
allowed
to choose
subject
whatever they want to study, others,
think
that they should
only
be permitted
to study science and technology
subject
that will develop their future. There are arguments on both sides of this
very
topical debate, and I will discuss them
now
.
On the one hand, opponents of the alternative
subjects
at university assume that
students
in such conditions would not be mature. This means, if they
only
educated
in particular
subjects
, it might be problem with their daily life in the future.
For example
, they could not
help
to their children with homework,
because of they
did not gain
a knowledge
from random
subject
.
However
,
students
who
studied
subject
which related to science and technology will be common
people
for society, as they have a knowledge about
many sphere
.
Finally
,
they
able to do
many
activities which might be useful for country development.
On the other hand
,
people
who
against to the compulsory education say that
students
who
are taught
with
many
themes
often
not
well educated
and in the future it might be troubles with job finding.
Because
studying in all
subjects
is mentally
hard
and
consequently
student
could not be ready with his chosen profession after graduation. While
students
who
choose particular
subjects
usually
will be
very
good
at their
sphere and
they
are sought
by employers every time.
Finally
, doing a job in which you are the best is essential side in this globalization.
In conclusion
, my
own
opinion is that
students
who
are provided
with wide range of choices in their schooling is the best technique of education, since it is
really
helpful for country development.
Of course
, this
is provided
if they
are managed
carefully and
it requires huge amount of specialist to balance all spheres.