Today, innovations in farming have changed citizens' lives far significantly. Some individuals believe that the new chemicals used in agriculture have had numerous drawbacks on people's health. However, others, myself included, believe that the positive influences can surpass the negative consequences.
On the one hand, some people believe that chemical materials used for food are like a tip of an iceberg. One reason is that they can increase the risk of obesity. Hormones are the ones which are applied as fertilisers in vegetables or animal products, causing the users to become more overweight. For example, the rate of obesity has fundamentally grown among the U. S. citizens, who use the greatest amounts of non-organic foods in the world. These types of foods are considerably more economical than the organic ones, being used hugely by Americans, who are number one when it comes to the obesity rate. Another side effect is the risk of resistance. Using of these chemical materials, crops may defend less themselves against mutated pests. In particular, billions of tonnes of corn products were ruined in Canada in 2009 because of new species of these modified pests, reported by the National Geographic magazine.
On the other hand, I give a green light to the usage of these products because of having more advantages. One important benefit is that these fertilisers have increased the productivity of agricultural products. Clearly, the more they are used by farmers, the more massive crops are generated. As a prime example, we can see the quality of apple has been improved notably, compared to the past. The shape, volume, colour and even price of it have been changed positively, and many of citizens can afford it; therefore, even low-income families are able to purchase it. Furthermore, crops are nourished by more valuable items. In many farm industries, vitamins and minerals are added to crops, leading them to become far nutritious than the organic products. In particular, had not these chemicals been used in rice, more children would have suffered from Vitamin B deficiency, the most abundant vitamin being found in non-organic rice.
In conclusion, although consumption of chemical materials can be partly risky, I personally believe that their advantages can be greater than their negative side effects. These materials have helped humans to not only be able to afford better their food, but they can consume more healthy products than before. If I were a governor, I would support those industries producing them.
Today
, innovations in farming have
changed
citizens'
lives
far
significantly
.
Some
individuals
believe
that the new
chemicals
used
in agriculture have had numerous drawbacks on
people
's health.
However
, others, myself included,
believe
that the
positive
influences can surpass the
negative
consequences.
On the one hand,
some
people
believe
that
chemical
materials
used
for
food
are like a tip of an iceberg. One reason is that they can increase the
risk
of obesity. Hormones are the
ones
which
are applied
as
fertilisers
in vegetables or animal
products
, causing the users to become more overweight.
For example
, the rate of obesity has
fundamentally
grown among the U. S. citizens, who
use
the greatest amounts of non-organic
foods
in the world. These types of
foods
are
considerably
more economical than the organic
ones
, being
used
hugely
by Americans, who are number one when it
comes
to the obesity rate. Another side effect is the
risk
of resistance. Using of these
chemical
materials
,
crops
may defend less themselves against mutated pests.
In particular
, billions of tonnes of corn
products
were ruined
in Canada in 2009
because
of new species of these modified pests, reported by the National Geographic magazine.
On the other hand
, I give a green light to the usage of these
products
because
of having more advantages. One
important
benefit is that these
fertilisers
have increased the productivity of agricultural
products
.
Clearly
, the more they are
used
by farmers, the more massive
crops
are generated
. As a prime example, we can
see
the quality of apple has been
improved
notably
, compared to the past. The shape, volume,
colour
and even price of it have been
changed
positively
, and
many
of citizens can afford it;
therefore
, even low-income families are able to
purchase
it.
Furthermore
,
crops
are nourished
by more valuable items. In
many
farm industries, vitamins and minerals are
added
to
crops
, leading them to become far nutritious than the organic
products
.
In particular
, had not these
chemicals
been
used
in rice, more children would have suffered from
Vitamin B
deficiency, the most abundant vitamin
being found
in non-organic rice.
In
conclusion, although consumption of
chemical
materials
can be partly risky, I
personally
believe
that their advantages can be greater than their
negative
side effects. These
materials
have
helped
humans to not
only
be able to afford better their
food
,
but
they can consume more healthy
products
than
before
. If I were a governor, I would support those industries producing them.